PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UPW vs. VUG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UPW vs. VUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Utilities (UPW) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UPW achieves a 3.01% return, which is significantly lower than VUG's 10.86% return. Over the past 10 years, UPW has underperformed VUG with an annualized return of 9.86%, while VUG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.40% annualized return.


UPW

1D
3.33%
1M
-12.03%
YTD
3.01%
6M
-1.90%
1Y
10.99%
3Y*
17.73%
5Y*
9.50%
10Y*
9.86%

VUG

1D
-0.28%
1M
7.37%
YTD
10.86%
6M
10.14%
1Y
30.39%
3Y*
26.46%
5Y*
15.71%
10Y*
18.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UPW vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UPW
ProShares Ultra Utilities
3.01%23.61%37.67%-22.37%-4.59%32.57%-17.15%48.59%2.36%22.53%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
10.86%19.40%32.69%46.83%-33.16%27.35%40.25%37.03%-3.32%27.72%

Correlation

The correlation between UPW and VUG is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2007

0.40

Over the past year, the correlation between UPW and VUG has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.40, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

UPW vs. VUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UPW
VUG

Utilities

100.0%
0.9%

Basic Materials

-

0.6%

Communication Services

-

17.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

1.5%

Energy

-

0.4%

Financial Services

-

4.3%

Healthcare

-

4.6%

Industrials

-

3.6%

Real Estate

-

1.0%

Technology

-

53.5%

Utilities

UPW
100.0%
VUG
0.9%

Basic Materials

UPW

-

VUG
0.6%

Communication Services

UPW

-

VUG
17.3%

Consumer Cyclical

UPW

-

VUG
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

UPW

-

VUG
1.5%

Energy

UPW

-

VUG
0.4%

Financial Services

UPW

-

VUG
4.3%

Healthcare

UPW

-

VUG
4.6%

Industrials

UPW

-

VUG
3.6%

Real Estate

UPW

-

VUG
1.0%

Technology

UPW

-

VUG
53.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UPW vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UPW
UPW Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
UPW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UPW Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
UPW Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
UPW Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
UPW Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

VUG
VUG Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
VUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUG Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
VUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUG Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UPW vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Utilities (UPW) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UPWVUGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.38

1.93

-1.55

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.70

2.60

-1.90

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.34

-0.25

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.61

1.90

-1.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.33

6.65

-5.32

UPW vs. VUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UPW Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is lower than the VUG Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UPW and VUG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UPWVUGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

1.93

-1.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.71

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

0.86

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.62

-0.37

Drawdowns

UPW vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UPW drawdown since its inception was -77.75%, which is greater than VUG's maximum drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPW and VUG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UPWVUGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.75%

-50.68%

-27.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.15%

-16.53%

-2.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.16%

-22.85%

-10.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.42%

-35.61%

-13.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.67%

-35.61%

-27.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.46%

-0.28%

-16.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.59%

-7.09%

-15.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.73%

4.71%

+4.02%

Volatility

UPW vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Utilities (UPW) has a higher volatility of 11.15% compared to Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) at 3.52%. This indicates that UPW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UPWVUGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.15%

3.52%

+7.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.82%

12.05%

+11.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.05%

15.80%

+13.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.42%

22.22%

+12.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.18%

21.44%

+15.74%

UPW vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

UPW has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

UPW vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison

UPW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, more than VUG's 0.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UPW
ProShares Ultra Utilities
1.55%1.67%1.83%2.40%1.55%1.30%0.83%0.83%1.98%1.51%1.70%2.16%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
0.37%0.41%0.47%0.58%0.70%0.48%0.66%0.95%1.32%1.14%1.39%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


UPW and VUG have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UPW has higher volatility (11.15%) compared to VUG (3.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UPW dropped -77.75% vs VUG's -50.68%.

On 10-year performance, VUG leads with 18.40% vs 9.86% for UPW. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VUG has been the lower-risk option at 3.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VUG has performed better with a 18.40% return vs 9.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UPW.

UPW has the higher dividend yield at 1.55%, compared with 0.37% for VUG.

UPW is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while VUG is Large Cap Growth Equities. UPW tracks Dow Jones U.S. Utilities Index (200%), while VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UPW and 0.03% for VUG.

VUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UPW and VUG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer