PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
UNM vs. VUG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between UNM and VUG is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.5

Performance

UNM vs. VUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Unum Group (UNM) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
38.35%
16.37%
UNM
VUG

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

UNM:

3.32

VUG:

1.70

Sortino Ratio

UNM:

4.50

VUG:

2.26

Omega Ratio

UNM:

1.62

VUG:

1.30

Calmar Ratio

UNM:

6.72

VUG:

2.36

Martin Ratio

UNM:

17.50

VUG:

8.96

Ulcer Index

UNM:

3.86%

VUG:

3.41%

Daily Std Dev

UNM:

20.37%

VUG:

18.01%

Max Drawdown

UNM:

-89.37%

VUG:

-50.68%

Current Drawdown

UNM:

0.00%

VUG:

-1.91%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UNM achieves a 6.44% return, which is significantly higher than VUG's 2.18% return. Over the past 10 years, UNM has underperformed VUG with an annualized return of 13.20%, while VUG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.22% annualized return.


UNM

YTD

6.44%

1M

6.41%

6M

36.02%

1Y

66.03%

5Y*

28.90%

10Y*

13.20%

VUG

YTD

2.18%

1M

1.25%

6M

14.46%

1Y

29.85%

5Y*

18.25%

10Y*

16.22%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

UNM vs. VUG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UNM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of UNM is 9898
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of UNM is 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of UNM is 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of UNM is 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of UNM is 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of UNM is 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

VUG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VUG is 7171
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VUG is 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VUG is 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VUG is 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VUG is 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VUG is 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

UNM vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Unum Group (UNM) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for UNM, currently valued at 3.32, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.003.321.70
The chart of Sortino ratio for UNM, currently valued at 4.50, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.004.502.26
The chart of Omega ratio for UNM, currently valued at 1.62, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.621.30
The chart of Calmar ratio for UNM, currently valued at 6.72, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.006.722.36
The chart of Martin ratio for UNM, currently valued at 17.50, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0017.508.96
UNM
VUG

The current UNM Sharpe Ratio is 3.32, which is higher than the VUG Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UNM and VUG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
3.32
1.70
UNM
VUG

Dividends

UNM vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison

UNM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%, more than VUG's 0.46% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
UNM
Unum Group
2.10%2.15%3.07%3.07%4.76%4.97%3.74%3.34%1.57%1.75%2.10%1.78%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
0.46%0.47%0.58%0.70%0.48%0.66%0.95%1.32%1.14%1.39%1.30%1.21%

Drawdowns

UNM vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UNM drawdown since its inception was -89.37%, which is greater than VUG's maximum drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNM and VUG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember20250
-1.91%
UNM
VUG

Volatility

UNM vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Unum Group (UNM) is 3.54%, while Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) has a volatility of 6.35%. This indicates that UNM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
3.54%
6.35%
UNM
VUG
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab