PortfoliosLab logo
UNM vs. VUG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between UNM and VUG is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.6

Performance

UNM vs. VUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Unum Group (UNM) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

600.00%700.00%800.00%900.00%1,000.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
744.99%
852.77%
UNM
VUG

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

UNM:

2.05

VUG:

0.57

Sortino Ratio

UNM:

2.77

VUG:

0.95

Omega Ratio

UNM:

1.42

VUG:

1.13

Calmar Ratio

UNM:

3.66

VUG:

0.62

Martin Ratio

UNM:

12.85

VUG:

2.22

Ulcer Index

UNM:

4.40%

VUG:

6.42%

Daily Std Dev

UNM:

27.69%

VUG:

24.95%

Max Drawdown

UNM:

-89.38%

VUG:

-50.68%

Current Drawdown

UNM:

-5.34%

VUG:

-11.84%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UNM achieves a 8.62% return, which is significantly higher than VUG's -8.15% return. Over the past 10 years, UNM has underperformed VUG with an annualized return of 12.34%, while VUG has yielded a comparatively higher 14.30% annualized return.


UNM

YTD

8.62%

1M

-3.67%

6M

28.63%

1Y

58.60%

5Y*

42.45%

10Y*

12.34%

VUG

YTD

-8.15%

1M

-1.08%

6M

-3.83%

1Y

12.88%

5Y*

17.06%

10Y*

14.30%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

UNM vs. VUG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UNM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of UNM is 9696
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of UNM is 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of UNM is 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of UNM is 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of UNM is 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of UNM is 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

VUG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VUG is 6666
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VUG is 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VUG is 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VUG is 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VUG is 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VUG is 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

UNM vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Unum Group (UNM) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for UNM, currently valued at 2.05, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
UNM: 2.05
VUG: 0.57
The chart of Sortino ratio for UNM, currently valued at 2.77, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
UNM: 2.77
VUG: 0.95
The chart of Omega ratio for UNM, currently valued at 1.42, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
UNM: 1.42
VUG: 1.13
The chart of Calmar ratio for UNM, currently valued at 3.66, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.00
UNM: 3.66
VUG: 0.62
The chart of Martin ratio for UNM, currently valued at 12.85, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.00
UNM: 12.85
VUG: 2.22

The current UNM Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is higher than the VUG Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UNM and VUG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
2.05
0.57
UNM
VUG

Dividends

UNM vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison

UNM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, more than VUG's 0.52% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
UNM
Unum Group
2.14%2.15%3.07%3.07%4.76%4.97%3.74%3.34%1.57%1.75%2.10%1.78%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
0.52%0.47%0.58%0.70%0.48%0.66%0.95%1.32%1.14%1.39%1.30%1.21%

Drawdowns

UNM vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UNM drawdown since its inception was -89.38%, which is greater than VUG's maximum drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNM and VUG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-5.34%
-11.84%
UNM
VUG

Volatility

UNM vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison

Unum Group (UNM) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) have volatilities of 17.10% and 16.77%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
17.10%
16.77%
UNM
VUG