UNG vs. SCHD
UNG (United States Natural Gas Fund LP) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UNG is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Natural Gas, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UNG returned -20.42%/yr vs 12.79%/yr for SCHD. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UNG charges 1.28%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
UNG vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UNG achieves a -1.14% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 19.82% return. Over the past 10 years, UNG has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of -20.42%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.79% annualized return.
UNG
- 1D
- 3.50%
- 1M
- 13.91%
- YTD
- -1.14%
- 6M
- -22.61%
- 1Y
- -28.33%
- 3Y*
- -21.15%
- 5Y*
- -22.57%
- 10Y*
- -20.42%
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 2.84%
- YTD
- 19.82%
- 6M
- 19.65%
- 1Y
- 28.76%
- 3Y*
- 15.59%
- 5Y*
- 8.50%
- 10Y*
- 12.79%
UNG vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UNG United States Natural Gas Fund LP | -1.14% | -27.07% | -17.11% | -64.04% | 12.89% | 35.76% | -45.43% | -31.77% | 5.96% | -37.58% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 19.82% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between UNG and SCHD is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2011 | 0.05 |
The correlation between UNG and SCHD shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.09 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UNG vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
UNG
SCHD
UNG vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United States Natural Gas Fund LP (UNG) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UNG | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.47 | -0.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.65 | 6.26 | -6.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.95 | 15.38 | -16.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UNG | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.47 | 2.64 | -3.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.35 | 0.59 | -0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.37 | 0.77 | -1.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.57 | 0.86 | -1.43 |
Drawdowns
UNG vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UNG drawdown since its inception was -99.88%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNG and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UNG | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.88% | -33.37% | -66.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.86% | -4.61% | -39.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.16% | -16.13% | -52.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.49% | -16.85% | -75.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -93.55% | -33.37% | -60.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.85% | -0.73% | -99.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -89.96% | -3.32% | -86.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.75% | 1.87% | +27.88% |
Volatility
UNG vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
United States Natural Gas Fund LP (UNG) has a higher volatility of 12.99% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 2.69%. This indicates that UNG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UNG | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.99% | 2.69% | +10.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 53.06% | 7.65% | +45.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.59% | 10.95% | +49.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 64.11% | 14.38% | +49.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.78% | 16.71% | +38.07% |
UNG vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
UNG has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
UNG vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
UNG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.24%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.24% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
UNG United States Natural Gas Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UNG and SCHD have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UNG has higher volatility (12.99%) compared to SCHD (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UNG dropped -99.88% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.79% vs -20.42% for UNG. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.79% return vs -20.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 1.28% for UNG.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.24%, compared with 0.00% for UNG.
UNG is categorized as Oil & Gas, while SCHD is Dividend. UNG tracks Front Month Natural Gas, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Concierge Technologies and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 1.28% for UNG and 0.06% for SCHD.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UNG and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer