UMMA vs. VSGX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

UMMA (Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF) and VSGX (Vanguard ESG International Stock ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - UMMA tracks the Dow Jones Islamic Market International Titans 100 Index while VSGX tracks the FTSE Global All Cap ex US Choice Index.. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, UMMA returned 22.81%/yr vs 19.80%/yr for VSGX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UMMA charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for VSGX.

Performance

UMMA vs. VSGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA) and Vanguard ESG International Stock ETF (VSGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UMMA achieves a 32.32% return, which is significantly higher than VSGX's 15.88% return.

UMMA

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 12.11%
• YTD: 32.32%
• 6M: 35.20%
• 1Y: 51.77%
• 3Y*: 22.81%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VSGX

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 5.38%
• YTD: 15.88%
• 6M: 18.28%
• 1Y: 32.42%
• 3Y*: 19.80%
• 5Y*: 7.82%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UMMA vs. VSGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
UMMA Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF	32.32%	26.65%	4.67%	18.84%	-21.62%
VSGX Vanguard ESG International Stock ETF	15.88%	30.77%	5.72%	15.62%	-18.28%

Correlation

The correlation between UMMA and VSGX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 10, 2022	0.90

The correlation between UMMA and VSGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

UMMA vs. VSGX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	UMMA	VSGX
Technology	42.9%	23.9%
Healthcare	16.6%	9.4%
Industrials	13.5%	9.8%
Basic Materials	9.3%	6.1%
Consumer Cyclical	8.1%	9.5%
Consumer Defensive	5.6%	5.1%
Energy	2.9%	0.0%
Communication Services	0.8%	4.5%
Real Estate	0.5%	3.2%
Financial Services	-	27.9%
Utilities	-	0.7%

Return for Risk

UMMA vs. VSGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UMMA

UMMA Risk / Return Rank: 76
UMMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
UMMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
UMMA Omega Ratio Rank: 76
UMMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
UMMA Martin Ratio Rank: 73

VSGX

VSGX Risk / Return Rank: 58
VSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
VSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
VSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 61
VSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
VSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UMMA vs. VSGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA) and Vanguard ESG International Stock ETF (VSGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UMMA	VSGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.59	1.99	+0.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.44	2.76	+0.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.36	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.48	2.54	+0.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.60	9.87	+3.73
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UMMA vs. VSGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UMMA Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is higher than the VSGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UMMA and VSGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UMMA	VSGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.59	1.99	+0.60
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.48	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.58	0.51	+0.07

Drawdowns

UMMA vs. VSGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UMMA drawdown since its inception was -34.17%, roughly equal to the maximum VSGX drawdown of -33.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMMA and VSGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	UMMA	VSGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.17%	-33.09%	-1.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.93%	-12.84%	-2.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.73%	-13.83%	-4.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-32.14%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.90%	-0.89%	-0.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.81%	-7.77%	-2.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.82%	3.29%	+0.53%

Volatility

UMMA vs. VSGX - Volatility Comparison

Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA) has a higher volatility of 7.54% compared to Vanguard ESG International Stock ETF (VSGX) at 6.00%. This indicates that UMMA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VSGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UMMA	VSGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.54%	6.00%	+1.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.26%	14.12%	+3.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.11%	16.36%	+3.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.55%	16.30%	+4.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.55%	18.04%	+2.51%

UMMA vs. VSGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

UMMA has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than VSGX's 0.12% expense ratio.

Dividends

UMMA vs. VSGX - Dividend Comparison

UMMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than VSGX's 2.85% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
UMMA Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF	0.93%	1.02%	0.91%	1.09%	1.77%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VSGX Vanguard ESG International Stock ETF	2.85%	3.23%	3.10%	2.77%	2.61%	2.49%	1.67%	2.28%	0.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UMMA and VSGX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, UMMA and VSGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, UMMA or VSGX?

UMMA has higher volatility (7.54%) compared to VSGX (6.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UMMA dropped -34.17% vs VSGX's -33.09%.

Which ETF is better, UMMA or VSGX?

On 3-year performance, UMMA leads with 22.81% vs 19.80% for VSGX. On fees, VSGX is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, VSGX has been the lower-risk option at 6.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UMMA or VSGX?

Over the 3-year period, UMMA has performed better with a 22.81% return vs 19.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UMMA or VSGX?

VSGX is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for UMMA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UMMA or VSGX?

VSGX has the higher dividend yield at 2.85%, compared with 0.93% for UMMA.

What is the main difference between UMMA and VSGX?

UMMA tracks Dow Jones Islamic Market International Titans 100 Index, while VSGX tracks FTSE Global All Cap ex US Choice Index.. They also come from different issuers: Wahed and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for UMMA and 0.12% for VSGX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UMMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.