PortfoliosLab logo
UMI vs. AMND
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between UMI and AMND is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

UMI vs. AMND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI) and ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy High Dividend Index ETN due July 19, 2050 (AMND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Returns By Period


UMI

YTD

2.73%

1M

4.54%

6M

2.58%

1Y

27.55%

5Y*

28.65%

10Y*

N/A

AMND

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


UMI vs. AMND - Expense Ratio Comparison

UMI has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than AMND's 0.75% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

UMI vs. AMND — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UMI
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of UMI is 8989
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of UMI is 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of UMI is 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of UMI is 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of UMI is 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of UMI is 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

AMND
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AMND is 9696
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AMND is 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AMND is 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AMND is 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AMND is 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AMND is 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

UMI vs. AMND - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI) and ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy High Dividend Index ETN due July 19, 2050 (AMND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

UMI vs. AMND - Dividend Comparison

UMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, while AMND has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017
UMI
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF
3.93%4.39%4.67%4.78%3.37%2.18%2.47%2.48%0.15%
AMND
ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy High Dividend Index ETN due July 19, 2050
2.64%5.14%6.56%6.37%7.10%2.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

UMI vs. AMND - Drawdown Comparison


Loading data...

Volatility

UMI vs. AMND - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...