UMDD vs. XLG
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD) and Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF (XLG).
UMDD and XLG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UMDD is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Index (300%). It was launched on Feb 9, 2010. XLG is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Russell Top 50 Index. It was launched on May 10, 2005. Both UMDD and XLG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: UMDD or XLG.
Correlation
The correlation between UMDD and XLG is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
UMDD vs. XLG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
UMDD:
0.49
XLG:
2.24
UMDD:
0.97
XLG:
2.92
UMDD:
1.12
XLG:
1.41
UMDD:
0.49
XLG:
2.98
UMDD:
2.37
XLG:
12.32
UMDD:
9.83%
XLG:
2.74%
UMDD:
47.97%
XLG:
15.08%
UMDD:
-86.24%
XLG:
-52.39%
UMDD:
-29.69%
XLG:
-3.08%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UMDD achieves a 19.71% return, which is significantly lower than XLG's 33.36% return. Over the past 10 years, UMDD has underperformed XLG with an annualized return of 9.15%, while XLG has yielded a comparatively higher 15.12% annualized return.
UMDD
19.71%
-10.07%
10.00%
18.90%
1.77%
9.15%
XLG
33.36%
2.50%
8.84%
33.15%
17.95%
15.12%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UMDD vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison
UMDD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
UMDD vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD) and Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
UMDD vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison
UMDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than XLG's 0.54% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UMDD ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 | 0.50% | 0.19% | 0.49% | 0.06% | 0.08% | 0.64% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.06% | 0.08% | 0.00% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF | 0.54% | 0.97% | 1.34% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.58% | 2.00% | 1.85% | 2.00% | 2.09% | 1.97% | 1.97% |
Drawdowns
UMDD vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UMDD drawdown since its inception was -86.24%, which is greater than XLG's maximum drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMDD and XLG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
UMDD vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD) has a higher volatility of 16.40% compared to Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF (XLG) at 4.07%. This indicates that UMDD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.