UMDD vs. XLG
UMDD (ProShares UltraPro MidCap400) and XLG (Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UMDD is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Index (300%), while XLG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UMDD returned 13.45%/yr vs 17.16%/yr for XLG. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UMDD charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XLG.
Performance
UMDD vs. XLG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UMDD achieves a 42.38% return, which is significantly higher than XLG's 3.55% return. Over the past 10 years, UMDD has underperformed XLG with an annualized return of 13.45%, while XLG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.16% annualized return.
UMDD
- 1D
- 1.32%
- 1M
- 10.37%
- YTD
- 42.38%
- 6M
- 33.72%
- 1Y
- 73.33%
- 3Y*
- 27.16%
- 5Y*
- 4.26%
- 10Y*
- 13.45%
XLG
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- -3.59%
- YTD
- 3.55%
- 6M
- 3.44%
- 1Y
- 23.61%
- 3Y*
- 22.12%
- 5Y*
- 14.84%
- 10Y*
- 17.16%
UMDD vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UMDD ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 | 42.38% | -2.57% | 19.68% | 27.21% | -49.60% | 72.27% | -17.30% | 78.90% | -40.29% | 49.17% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | 3.55% | 19.51% | 33.49% | 38.16% | -24.29% | 30.77% | 24.15% | 32.04% | -3.59% | 23.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between UMDD and XLG is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010 | 0.75 |
Over the past year, the correlation between UMDD and XLG has dropped to 0.54 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
UMDD vs. XLG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UMDD
XLG
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
-
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
-
Communication Services
Industrials
UMDD
XLG
Technology
UMDD
XLG
Financial Services
UMDD
XLG
Consumer Cyclical
UMDD
XLG
Healthcare
UMDD
XLG
Real Estate
UMDD
XLG
-
Energy
UMDD
XLG
Basic Materials
UMDD
XLG
Consumer Defensive
UMDD
XLG
Utilities
UMDD
XLG
-
Communication Services
UMDD
XLG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UMDD vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank
UMDD
XLG
UMDD vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UMDD | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.31 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.83 | 1.91 | +0.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.47 | 6.89 | +2.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UMDD vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UMDD drawdown since its inception was -86.24%, which is greater than XLG's maximum drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMDD and XLG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UMDD | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.24% | -52.39% | -33.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.04% | -12.41% | -13.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -60.33% | -20.70% | -39.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.61% | -28.02% | -36.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.24% | -30.46% | -55.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.49% | -5.13% | +2.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.55% | -7.63% | -15.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.77% | 3.44% | +4.33% |
Volatility
UMDD vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD) has a higher volatility of 13.05% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) at 4.74%. This indicates that UMDD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UMDD | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.05% | 4.74% | +8.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.18% | 10.60% | +24.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.50% | 13.86% | +33.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.95% | 18.77% | +40.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.35% | 18.89% | +43.46% |
UMDD vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison
UMDD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
UMDD vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison
UMDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than XLG's 0.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UMDD ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 | 0.74% | 1.00% | 0.76% | 0.19% | 0.49% | 0.06% | 0.08% | 0.64% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.06% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | 0.82% | 0.64% | 0.72% | 0.97% | 1.34% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.58% | 2.00% | 1.85% | 2.00% | 2.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UMDD and XLG have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UMDD has higher volatility (13.05%) compared to XLG (4.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UMDD dropped -86.24% vs XLG's -52.39%.
On 10-year performance, XLG leads with 17.16% vs 13.45% for UMDD. On fees, XLG is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, XLG has been the lower-risk option at 4.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLG has performed better with a 17.16% return vs 13.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLG is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UMDD.
XLG has the higher dividend yield at 0.82%, compared with 0.74% for UMDD.
UMDD is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while XLG is S&P 500. UMDD tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index (300%), while XLG tracks S&P 500 Top 50 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UMDD and 0.20% for XLG.
XLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UMDD and XLG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer