UMDD vs. TNA

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

UMDD (ProShares UltraPro MidCap400) and TNA (Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds - UMDD tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Index (300%) while TNA tracks the Russell 2000 Index (300% Daily). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UMDD returned 10.96%/yr vs 6.91%/yr for TNA. Their correlation of 0.94 means they have usually moved in the same direction. UMDD charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for TNA.

Performance

UMDD vs. TNA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UMDD achieves a 39.73% return, which is significantly lower than TNA's 56.19% return. Over the past 10 years, UMDD has outperformed TNA with an annualized return of 10.96%, while TNA has yielded a comparatively lower 6.91% annualized return.

UMDD

• 1D: 3.16%
• 1M: -0.95%
• 6M: 22.93%
• YTD: 39.73%
• 1Y: 60.12%
• 3Y*: 19.36%
• 5Y*: 3.98%
• 10Y*: 10.96%
• ALL TIME*: 19.42%

TNA

• 1D: 5.04%
• 1M: -2.54%
• 6M: 31.47%
• YTD: 56.19%
• 1Y: 119.05%
• 3Y*: 23.49%
• 5Y*: -2.29%
• 10Y*: 6.91%
• ALL TIME*: 14.63%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
TNA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares	$289.87M	$297.37M	$409.17M
UMDD ProShares UltraPro MidCap400	$270.14K	$258.68K	$250.88K

UMDD vs. TNA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
UMDD ProShares UltraPro MidCap400	39.73%	-2.57%	19.68%	27.21%	-49.60%	72.27%	-17.30%	78.90%	-40.29%	49.17%
TNA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares	56.19%	9.82%	7.21%	26.24%	-62.48%	27.88%	-7.82%	71.88%	-39.89%	39.15%

Correlation

The correlation between UMDD and TNA is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010	0.94

The correlation between UMDD and TNA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

UMDD vs. TNA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	UMDD	TNA
Industrials	25.3%	14.2%
Technology	17.2%	14.8%
Financial Services	13.9%	17.5%
Consumer Cyclical	10.5%	9.2%
Healthcare	9.0%	20.3%
Real Estate	7.2%	6.6%
Basic Materials	4.8%	4.4%
Energy	4.6%	5.5%
Consumer Defensive	3.2%	2.6%
Utilities	2.9%	2.7%
Communication Services	1.5%	2.2%

Return for Risk

UMDD vs. TNA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

UMDD

UMDD Risk / Return Rank: 55
UMDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
UMDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
UMDD Omega Ratio Rank: 49
UMDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
UMDD Martin Ratio Rank: 62

TNA

TNA Risk / Return Rank: 82
TNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
TNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
TNA Omega Ratio Rank: 71
TNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
TNA Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

UMDD vs. TNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UMDD	TNA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.28	2.08	-0.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.91	2.57	-0.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.30	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.32	3.68	-1.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.72	12.08	-4.36

UMDD vs. TNA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UMDD Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is lower than the TNA Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UMDD and TNA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

UMDD vs. TNA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UMDD drawdown since its inception was -86.24%, roughly equal to the maximum TNA drawdown of -88.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMDD and TNA.

Drawdown Indicators

	UMDD	TNA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-86.24%	-88.09%	+1.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.04%	-32.53%	+6.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-60.33%	-65.78%	+5.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-64.61%	-82.36%	+17.75%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-86.24%	-88.09%	+1.85%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.06%	-33.94%	+28.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.43%	-33.92%	+10.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.81%	9.89%	-2.08%

Volatility

UMDD vs. TNA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD) is 11.11%, while Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA) has a volatility of 12.47%. This indicates that UMDD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TNA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UMDD	TNA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.11%	12.47%	-1.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.07%	42.13%	-7.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.12%	57.70%	-10.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	58.72%	67.24%	-8.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	62.12%	68.38%	-6.26%

UMDD vs. TNA - Expense Ratio Comparison

UMDD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than TNA's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

UMDD vs. TNA - Dividend Comparison

UMDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, more than TNA's 0.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
TNA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares	0.30%	0.78%	0.93%	1.27%	0.31%	0.06%	0.03%	0.44%	0.36%	0.15%	0.00%	0.00%
UMDD ProShares UltraPro MidCap400	0.67%	1.00%	0.76%	0.19%	0.49%	0.06%	0.08%	0.64%	0.32%	0.00%	0.03%	0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UMDD and TNA in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, UMDD and TNA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, UMDD or TNA?

TNA has higher volatility (12.47%) compared to UMDD (11.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UMDD dropped -86.24% vs TNA's -88.09%.

Which ETF is better, UMDD or TNA?

On 10-year performance, UMDD leads with 10.96% vs 6.91% for TNA. On fees, UMDD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, UMDD has been the lower-risk option at 11.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UMDD or TNA?

Over the 10-year period, UMDD has performed better with a 10.96% return vs 6.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UMDD or TNA?

UMDD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TNA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UMDD or TNA?

UMDD has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.30% for TNA.

What is the main difference between UMDD and TNA?

UMDD tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index (300%), while TNA tracks Russell 2000 Index (300% Daily). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UMDD and 1.05% for TNA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TNA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.