UMC vs. VOO
UMC (United Microelectronics Corporation) is a stock, while VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) is S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 10 years, UMC returned 31.41%/yr vs 15.17%/yr for VOO. Their 0.45 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
UMC vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UMC achieves a 141.97% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 11.72% return. Over the past 10 years, UMC has outperformed VOO with an annualized return of 31.41%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively lower 15.17% annualized return.
UMC
- 1D
- -1.79%
- 1M
- -22.50%
- 6M
- 89.43%
- YTD
- 141.97%
- 1Y
- 179.28%
- 3Y*
- 43.23%
- 5Y*
- 17.48%
- 10Y*
- 31.41%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.06%
VOO
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- 1.69%
- 6M
- 9.53%
- YTD
- 11.72%
- 1Y
- 23.30%
- 3Y*
- 20.85%
- 5Y*
- 13.12%
- 10Y*
- 15.17%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.88%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $322.80M | $355.87M | $383.42M | |
| $3.97B | $3.80B | $5.49B |
UMC vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UMC United Microelectronics Corporation | 141.97% | 28.65% | -19.01% | 39.20% | -40.32% | 43.16% | 230.69% | 56.10% | -21.85% | 39.99% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 11.72% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between UMC and VOO is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.56 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010 | 0.45 |
The correlation between UMC and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.56 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UMC vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
UMC
VOO
UMC vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United Microelectronics Corporation (UMC) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UMC | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.33 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.77 | 2.63 | +2.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.94 | 11.23 | +2.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UMC vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UMC drawdown since its inception was -72.52%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMC and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UMC | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.52% | -33.99% | -38.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.84% | -8.90% | -28.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.84% | -18.69% | -19.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.30% | -24.52% | -29.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.30% | -33.99% | -20.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.10% | 0.00% | -32.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.39% | -3.67% | -38.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.92% | 2.08% | +10.84% |
Volatility
UMC vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
United Microelectronics Corporation (UMC) has a higher volatility of 24.49% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 3.81%. This indicates that UMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UMC | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.49% | 3.81% | +20.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 49.91% | 10.18% | +39.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.27% | 12.80% | +47.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.40% | 16.95% | +25.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.09% | 18.02% | +23.07% |
Dividends
UMC vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
UMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, more than VOO's 1.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UMC United Microelectronics Corporation | 2.21% | 6.06% | 7.14% | 6.93% | 7.92% | 2.44% | 1.62% | 3.51% | 6.59% | 2.41% | 3.61% | 3.15% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.05% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UMC and VOO have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UMC has higher volatility (24.49%) compared to VOO (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UMC dropped -72.52% vs VOO's -33.99%.
UMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UMC and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer