ULTY vs. SCHG

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

ULTY (YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ULTY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. ULTY is actively managed, while SCHG is passively managed. Over the past year, ULTY returned 7.83% vs 23.20% for SCHG. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ULTY charges 1.14%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.

Performance

ULTY vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF (ULTY) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ULTY achieves a 11.58% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 5.03% return.

ULTY

• 1D: 2.56%
• 1M: 3.18%
• YTD: 11.58%
• 6M: 13.08%
• 1Y: 7.83%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SCHG

• 1D: 2.39%
• 1M: -0.12%
• YTD: 5.03%
• 6M: 5.98%
• 1Y: 23.20%
• 3Y*: 23.27%
• 5Y*: 14.85%
• 10Y*: 18.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ULTY vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ULTY YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF	11.58%	-0.84%	-4.73%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	5.03%	17.50%	23.79%

Correlation

The correlation between ULTY and SCHG is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 29, 2024	0.73

The correlation between ULTY and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

ULTY vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ULTY	SCHG
Technology	52.3%	46.7%
Basic Materials	12.0%	1.3%
Industrials	10.6%	6.0%
Financial Services	9.8%	6.6%
Communication Services	7.6%	15.3%
Consumer Cyclical	6.6%	12.4%
Healthcare	1.1%	8.4%
Consumer Defensive	0.0%	1.6%
Energy	-	0.7%
Real Estate	-	0.5%
Utilities	-	0.4%

Return for Risk

ULTY vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ULTY

ULTY Risk / Return Rank: 14
ULTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
ULTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
ULTY Omega Ratio Rank: 14
ULTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
ULTY Martin Ratio Rank: 12

SCHG

SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 40
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 44
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ULTY vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF (ULTY) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ULTY	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.36	1.45	-1.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.62	1.98	-1.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.26	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.33	1.42	-1.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.63	4.68	-4.05

ULTY vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ULTY Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is lower than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ULTY and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ULTY vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ULTY drawdown since its inception was -26.85%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ULTY and SCHG.

Drawdown Indicators

	ULTY	SCHG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.85%	-34.59%	+7.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.16%	-16.41%	-7.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.39%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.59%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.51%	-3.06%	-5.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.89%	-5.20%	-4.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.48%	4.97%	+7.51%

Volatility

ULTY vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF (ULTY) has a higher volatility of 8.42% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 5.59%. This indicates that ULTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ULTY	SCHG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.42%	5.59%	+2.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.58%	12.52%	+4.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.69%	16.09%	+5.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.35%	22.35%	+5.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.35%	21.60%	+5.75%

ULTY vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ULTY has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

ULTY vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

ULTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 110.56%, more than SCHG's 0.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	0.37%	0.36%	0.39%	0.46%	0.55%	0.42%	0.52%	0.82%	1.27%	1.01%	1.04%	1.22%
ULTY YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF	110.56%	142.99%	111.70%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ULTY and SCHG in my portfolio?

ULTY and SCHG have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ULTY or SCHG?

ULTY has higher volatility (8.42%) compared to SCHG (5.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ULTY dropped -26.85% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

Which ETF is better, ULTY or SCHG?

On 1-year performance, SCHG leads with 23.20% vs 7.83% for ULTY. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHG has been the lower-risk option at 5.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ULTY or SCHG?

Over the 1-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 23.20% return vs 7.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ULTY or SCHG?

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for ULTY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ULTY or SCHG?

ULTY has the higher dividend yield at 110.56%, compared with 0.37% for SCHG.

What is the main difference between ULTY and SCHG?

ULTY is categorized as Derivative Income, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 1.14% for ULTY and 0.04% for SCHG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.