ULTA vs. MNST

In the year-to-date period, ULTA achieves a -30.94% return, which is significantly lower than MNST's -6.16% return. Over the past 10 years, ULTA has underperformed MNST with an annualized return of 10.43%, while MNST has yielded a comparatively higher 11.40% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ulta Beauty, Inc. (ULTA) and Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current ULTA Sharpe Ratio is -0.52, which is lower than the MNST Sharpe Ratio of -0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ULTA and MNST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither ULTA nor MNST has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum ULTA drawdown since its inception was -87.89%, which is greater than MNST's maximum drawdown of -69.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ULTA and MNST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Ulta Beauty, Inc. (ULTA) is 8.62%, while Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) has a volatility of 9.47%. This indicates that ULTA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MNST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ulta Beauty, Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.