PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
ULTA vs. COST
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between ULTA and COST is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.3

Performance

ULTA vs. COST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ulta Beauty, Inc. (ULTA) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
15.02%
11.43%
ULTA
COST

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ULTA:

-0.25

COST:

2.23

Sortino Ratio

ULTA:

-0.12

COST:

2.81

Omega Ratio

ULTA:

0.98

COST:

1.40

Calmar Ratio

ULTA:

-0.20

COST:

4.06

Martin Ratio

ULTA:

-0.31

COST:

10.39

Ulcer Index

ULTA:

27.64%

COST:

4.02%

Daily Std Dev

ULTA:

34.23%

COST:

18.74%

Max Drawdown

ULTA:

-87.89%

COST:

-53.39%

Current Drawdown

ULTA:

-22.04%

COST:

-5.53%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ULTA:

$20.50B

COST:

$417.13B

EPS

ULTA:

$24.98

COST:

$17.01

PE Ratio

ULTA:

17.70

COST:

55.24

PEG Ratio

ULTA:

3.01

COST:

5.64

Total Revenue (TTM)

ULTA:

$11.36B

COST:

$258.81B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ULTA:

$4.39B

COST:

$32.80B

EBITDA (TTM)

ULTA:

$1.84B

COST:

$12.25B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ULTA achieves a -9.76% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 43.19% return. Over the past 10 years, ULTA has underperformed COST with an annualized return of 13.16%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 23.29% annualized return.


ULTA

YTD

-9.76%

1M

17.83%

6M

14.59%

1Y

-9.18%

5Y*

11.82%

10Y*

13.16%

COST

YTD

43.19%

1M

-2.27%

6M

10.86%

1Y

42.54%

5Y*

28.35%

10Y*

23.29%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ULTA vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ulta Beauty, Inc. (ULTA) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ULTA, currently valued at -0.25, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.00-0.252.23
The chart of Sortino ratio for ULTA, currently valued at -0.12, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.122.81
The chart of Omega ratio for ULTA, currently valued at 0.98, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.981.40
The chart of Calmar ratio for ULTA, currently valued at -0.20, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.204.06
The chart of Martin ratio for ULTA, currently valued at -0.31, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.00-0.3110.39
ULTA
COST

The current ULTA Sharpe Ratio is -0.25, which is lower than the COST Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ULTA and COST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.004.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-0.25
2.23
ULTA
COST

Dividends

ULTA vs. COST - Dividend Comparison

ULTA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
ULTA
Ulta Beauty, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
0.48%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%0.97%1.01%

Drawdowns

ULTA vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ULTA drawdown since its inception was -87.89%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ULTA and COST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-22.04%
-5.53%
ULTA
COST

Volatility

ULTA vs. COST - Volatility Comparison

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (ULTA) has a higher volatility of 11.84% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 4.06%. This indicates that ULTA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
11.84%
4.06%
ULTA
COST

Financials

ULTA vs. COST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ulta Beauty, Inc. and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab