PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UL vs. PFE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

UL vs. PFE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Unilever Group (UL) and Pfizer Inc. (PFE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UL achieves a -13.97% return, which is significantly lower than PFE's 5.18% return. Over the past 10 years, UL has outperformed PFE with an annualized return of 3.99%, while PFE has yielded a comparatively lower 1.85% annualized return.


UL

1D
-0.40%
1M
-4.89%
YTD
-13.97%
6M
-15.83%
1Y
-18.94%
3Y*
2.44%
5Y*
-0.68%
10Y*
3.99%

PFE

1D
-0.82%
1M
-2.06%
YTD
5.18%
6M
2.42%
1Y
16.11%
3Y*
-7.32%
5Y*
-3.51%
10Y*
1.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UL vs. PFE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UL
The Unilever Group
-13.97%5.96%20.90%-0.17%-2.82%-7.61%9.04%12.88%-2.34%40.15%
PFE
Pfizer Inc.
5.18%0.65%-2.22%-41.26%-10.41%66.70%3.07%-6.91%24.82%15.90%

Correlation

The correlation between UL and PFE is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2012

0.30

Fundamentals

Market Cap

UL:

$121.42B

PFE:

$145.22B

EPS

UL:

$5.06

PFE:

$1.31

PE Ratio

UL:

10.92

PFE:

19.31

PEG Ratio

UL:

2.14

PFE:

0.35

PS Ratio

UL:

1.18

PFE:

2.28

PB Ratio

UL:

7.82

PFE:

1.61

Total Revenue (TTM)

UL:

$109.27B

PFE:

$63.32B

Gross Profit (TTM)

UL:

$90.89B

PFE:

$43.91B

EBITDA (TTM)

UL:

$24.12B

PFE:

$16.94B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UL vs. PFE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UL
UL Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
UL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UL Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
UL Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
UL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
UL Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

PFE
PFE Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
PFE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFE Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
PFE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFE Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UL vs. PFE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Unilever Group (UL) and Pfizer Inc. (PFE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ULPFEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.86

1.14

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.76

1.41

-2.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.63

2.91

-4.54

UL vs. PFE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UL Sharpe Ratio is -0.91, which is lower than the PFE Sharpe Ratio of 0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UL and PFE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ULPFEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.91

0.68

-1.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

-0.14

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

0.08

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.23

+0.16

Drawdowns

UL vs. PFE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UL drawdown since its inception was -53.55%, smaller than the maximum PFE drawdown of -58.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UL and PFE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ULPFEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.55%

-58.96%

+5.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.09%

-11.47%

-13.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.09%

-40.75%

+15.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.53%

-58.96%

+32.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.13%

-58.96%

+28.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.57%

-47.49%

+22.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.60%

-17.68%

+7.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.65%

5.54%

+6.11%

Volatility

UL vs. PFE - Volatility Comparison

The Unilever Group (UL) has a higher volatility of 5.31% compared to Pfizer Inc. (PFE) at 4.07%. This indicates that UL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ULPFEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.31%

4.07%

+1.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.91%

14.64%

+3.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.00%

23.85%

-2.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.78%

25.49%

-4.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.59%

23.88%

-2.29%

Dividends

UL vs. PFE - Dividend Comparison

UL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, less than PFE's 6.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PFE
Pfizer Inc.
6.79%6.91%6.33%5.70%3.12%2.64%3.92%3.68%3.12%3.53%3.69%3.47%
UL
The Unilever Group
4.12%3.51%3.29%3.83%3.57%3.77%3.07%3.18%3.49%2.80%3.42%3.02%

Financials

UL vs. PFE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Unilever Group and Pfizer Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B202120222023202420252026
18.38B
14.45B
(UL) Total Revenue
(PFE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

UL vs. PFE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Unilever Group and Pfizer Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%2021202220232024202520260
67.3%
Portfolio components
UL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Unilever Group reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 18.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

PFE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pfizer Inc. reported a gross profit of 9.72B and revenue of 14.45B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.3%.

UL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Unilever Group reported an operating income of 4.13B and revenue of 18.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.5%.

PFE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pfizer Inc. reported an operating income of 4.03B and revenue of 14.45B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.9%.

UL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Unilever Group reported a net income of 2.56B and revenue of 18.38B, resulting in a net margin of 14.0%.

PFE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pfizer Inc. reported a net income of 2.69B and revenue of 14.45B, resulting in a net margin of 18.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


UL and PFE have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UL has higher volatility (5.31%) compared to PFE (4.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UL dropped -53.55% vs PFE's -58.96%.

PFE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.68 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UL and PFE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer