PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UHT vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UHT vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Universal Health Realty Income Trust (UHT) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UHT achieves a 3.28% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 21.30% return. Over the past 10 years, UHT has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 1.77%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 21.94% annualized return.


UHT

1D
-2.09%
1M
-0.28%
YTD
3.28%
6M
1.55%
1Y
4.99%
3Y*
2.68%
5Y*
-5.04%
10Y*
1.77%

QQQ

1D
-0.26%
1M
10.60%
YTD
21.30%
6M
19.66%
1Y
41.82%
3Y*
28.78%
5Y*
17.97%
10Y*
21.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UHT vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UHT
Universal Health Realty Income Trust
3.28%13.29%-7.45%-3.63%-15.25%-3.35%-43.24%96.94%-14.89%18.83%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
21.30%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between UHT and QQQ is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 1999

0.34

Over the past year, the correlation between UHT and QQQ has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.34, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UHT vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UHT
UHT Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
UHT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UHT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
UHT Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
UHT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
UHT Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UHT vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Universal Health Realty Income Trust (UHT) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UHTQQQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.24

2.64

-2.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.46

3.45

-2.98

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.45

-0.39

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.35

3.51

-3.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.93

13.49

-12.56

UHT vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UHT Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UHT and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UHTQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

2.64

-2.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.21

0.81

-1.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

0.99

-0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.41

+0.02

Drawdowns

UHT vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UHT drawdown since its inception was -69.20%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UHT and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UHTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.20%

-82.97%

+13.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.43%

-11.96%

-2.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.63%

-22.77%

-7.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.84%

-35.12%

-12.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.20%

-35.12%

-34.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-56.33%

-0.26%

-56.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.31%

-32.79%

+17.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.36%

3.11%

+2.25%

Volatility

UHT vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

Universal Health Realty Income Trust (UHT) has a higher volatility of 5.50% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 4.49%. This indicates that UHT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UHTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.50%

4.49%

+1.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.23%

12.10%

+2.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.07%

15.94%

+5.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.03%

22.38%

+1.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.46%

22.29%

+11.17%

Dividends

UHT vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

UHT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.47%, more than QQQ's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.38%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%
UHT
Universal Health Realty Income Trust
7.47%7.55%7.85%6.66%5.95%4.71%4.29%2.32%4.37%3.51%3.96%5.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


UHT and QQQ have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UHT has higher volatility (5.50%) compared to QQQ (4.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UHT dropped -69.20% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UHT and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer