UHT vs. QQQ
UHT (Universal Health Realty Income Trust) is a stock, while QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Over the past 10 years, UHT returned 1.77%/yr vs 21.94%/yr for QQQ. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
UHT vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UHT achieves a 3.28% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 21.30% return. Over the past 10 years, UHT has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 1.77%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 21.94% annualized return.
UHT
- 1D
- -2.09%
- 1M
- -0.28%
- YTD
- 3.28%
- 6M
- 1.55%
- 1Y
- 4.99%
- 3Y*
- 2.68%
- 5Y*
- -5.04%
- 10Y*
- 1.77%
QQQ
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 10.60%
- YTD
- 21.30%
- 6M
- 19.66%
- 1Y
- 41.82%
- 3Y*
- 28.78%
- 5Y*
- 17.97%
- 10Y*
- 21.94%
UHT vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UHT Universal Health Realty Income Trust | 3.28% | 13.29% | -7.45% | -3.63% | -15.25% | -3.35% | -43.24% | 96.94% | -14.89% | 18.83% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 21.30% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between UHT and QQQ is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 1999 | 0.34 |
Over the past year, the correlation between UHT and QQQ has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.34, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UHT vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
UHT
QQQ
UHT vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Universal Health Realty Income Trust (UHT) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UHT | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.24 | 2.64 | -2.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.46 | 3.45 | -2.98 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.45 | -0.39 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.35 | 3.51 | -3.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.93 | 13.49 | -12.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UHT | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 | 2.64 | -2.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.21 | 0.81 | -1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.05 | 0.99 | -0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.41 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
UHT vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UHT drawdown since its inception was -69.20%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UHT and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UHT | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.20% | -82.97% | +13.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.43% | -11.96% | -2.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.63% | -22.77% | -7.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.84% | -35.12% | -12.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.20% | -35.12% | -34.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.33% | -0.26% | -56.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.31% | -32.79% | +17.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.36% | 3.11% | +2.25% |
Volatility
UHT vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
Universal Health Realty Income Trust (UHT) has a higher volatility of 5.50% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 4.49%. This indicates that UHT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UHT | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.50% | 4.49% | +1.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.23% | 12.10% | +2.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.07% | 15.94% | +5.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.03% | 22.38% | +1.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.46% | 22.29% | +11.17% |
Dividends
UHT vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
UHT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.47%, more than QQQ's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.38% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
UHT Universal Health Realty Income Trust | 7.47% | 7.55% | 7.85% | 6.66% | 5.95% | 4.71% | 4.29% | 2.32% | 4.37% | 3.51% | 3.96% | 5.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UHT and QQQ have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UHT has higher volatility (5.50%) compared to QQQ (4.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UHT dropped -69.20% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UHT and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer