PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
UHT vs. CTO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


UHTCTO
YTD Return3.89%26.42%
1Y Return16.66%37.80%
3Y Return (Ann)-5.06%12.45%
5Y Return (Ann)-13.79%10.85%
10Y Return (Ann)3.50%7.94%
Sharpe Ratio0.531.66
Sortino Ratio0.932.21
Omega Ratio1.111.35
Calmar Ratio0.211.80
Martin Ratio1.298.67
Ulcer Index11.07%4.15%
Daily Std Dev26.63%21.62%
Max Drawdown-69.20%-74.79%
Current Drawdown-58.10%-0.89%

Fundamentals


UHTCTO
Market Cap$589.29M$615.71M
EPS$1.32$0.61
PE Ratio32.2333.67
PEG Ratio0.000.00
Total Revenue (TTM)$24.32M$118.66M
Gross Profit (TTM)-$53.20M$52.34M
EBITDA (TTM)$65.05M$76.06M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between UHT and CTO is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

UHT vs. CTO - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, UHT achieves a 3.89% return, which is significantly lower than CTO's 26.42% return. Over the past 10 years, UHT has underperformed CTO with an annualized return of 3.50%, while CTO has yielded a comparatively higher 7.94% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
17.43%
23.81%
UHT
CTO

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

UHT vs. CTO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Universal Health Realty Income Trust (UHT) and CTO Realty Growth, Inc. (CTO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UHT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for UHT, currently valued at 0.53, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.53
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for UHT, currently valued at 0.93, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.93
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for UHT, currently valued at 1.11, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.11
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for UHT, currently valued at 0.21, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.21
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for UHT, currently valued at 1.29, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.001.29
CTO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CTO, currently valued at 1.66, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.66
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CTO, currently valued at 2.21, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.21
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CTO, currently valued at 1.35, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.35
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CTO, currently valued at 1.80, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.80
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CTO, currently valued at 8.67, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.008.67

UHT vs. CTO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UHT Sharpe Ratio is 0.53, which is lower than the CTO Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UHT and CTO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.53
1.66
UHT
CTO

Dividends

UHT vs. CTO - Dividend Comparison

UHT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.84%, less than CTO's 7.40% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
UHT
Universal Health Realty Income Trust
6.84%6.66%5.95%4.71%4.29%2.32%4.37%3.51%3.96%5.12%5.24%6.23%
CTO
CTO Realty Growth, Inc.
7.40%8.77%8.17%6.51%32.57%0.73%0.51%0.28%0.22%0.15%0.13%0.17%

Drawdowns

UHT vs. CTO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UHT drawdown since its inception was -69.20%, smaller than the maximum CTO drawdown of -74.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UHT and CTO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-58.10%
-0.89%
UHT
CTO

Volatility

UHT vs. CTO - Volatility Comparison

Universal Health Realty Income Trust (UHT) has a higher volatility of 7.42% compared to CTO Realty Growth, Inc. (CTO) at 4.77%. This indicates that UHT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CTO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
7.42%
4.77%
UHT
CTO

Financials

UHT vs. CTO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Universal Health Realty Income Trust and CTO Realty Growth, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items