PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UHT vs. ABBV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

UHT vs. ABBV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Universal Health Realty Income Trust (UHT) and AbbVie Inc. (ABBV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UHT achieves a 5.98% return, which is significantly higher than ABBV's 4.43% return. Over the past 10 years, UHT has underperformed ABBV with an annualized return of 1.84%, while ABBV has yielded a comparatively higher 19.47% annualized return.


UHT

1D
4.66%
1M
-3.57%
YTD
5.98%
6M
5.81%
1Y
5.09%
3Y*
2.47%
5Y*
-1.94%
10Y*
1.84%

ABBV

1D
2.07%
1M
8.84%
YTD
4.43%
6M
4.29%
1Y
31.92%
3Y*
24.36%
5Y*
19.80%
10Y*
19.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UHT vs. ABBV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UHT
Universal Health Realty Income Trust
5.98%13.29%-7.45%-3.63%-15.25%-3.35%-43.24%96.94%-14.89%18.83%
ABBV
AbbVie Inc.
4.43%33.08%18.86%-0.23%24.01%32.43%27.72%1.47%-0.96%60.07%

Correlation

The correlation between UHT and ABBV is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013

0.24

Fundamentals

Market Cap

UHT:

$554.72M

ABBV:

$416.46B

EPS

UHT:

$1.29

ABBV:

$2.05

PE Ratio

UHT:

31.05

ABBV:

114.38

PS Ratio

UHT:

4.46

ABBV:

6.63

PB Ratio

UHT:

3.75

ABBV:

15.14

Total Revenue (TTM)

UHT:

$124.13M

ABBV:

$62.82B

Gross Profit (TTM)

UHT:

$117.21M

ABBV:

$46.15B

EBITDA (TTM)

UHT:

$55.15M

ABBV:

$17.96B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UHT vs. ABBV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UHT
UHT Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
UHT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UHT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
UHT Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
UHT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
UHT Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

ABBV
ABBV Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
ABBV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABBV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABBV Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
ABBV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABBV Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UHT vs. ABBV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Universal Health Realty Income Trust (UHT) and AbbVie Inc. (ABBV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UHTABBVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.24

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.35

1.85

-1.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.90

4.11

-3.22

UHT vs. ABBV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UHT Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is lower than the ABBV Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UHT and ABBV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UHT vs. ABBV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UHT drawdown since its inception was -69.20%, which is greater than ABBV's maximum drawdown of -45.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UHT and ABBV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UHTABBVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.20%

-45.09%

-24.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.43%

-17.32%

+2.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.63%

-20.74%

-9.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.20%

-21.92%

-17.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.20%

-45.09%

-24.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-55.18%

-1.66%

-53.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.36%

-10.70%

-4.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.68%

7.78%

-2.10%

Volatility

UHT vs. ABBV - Volatility Comparison

Universal Health Realty Income Trust (UHT) has a higher volatility of 9.89% compared to AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) at 9.26%. This indicates that UHT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABBV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UHTABBVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.89%

9.26%

+0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.36%

19.11%

-2.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.58%

25.23%

-2.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.04%

23.12%

+0.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.58%

25.83%

+7.75%

Dividends

UHT vs. ABBV - Dividend Comparison

UHT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.45%, more than ABBV's 2.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABBV
AbbVie Inc.
2.87%2.87%3.49%3.82%3.49%3.84%4.41%4.83%3.89%2.65%3.64%3.41%
UHT
Universal Health Realty Income Trust
7.45%7.55%7.85%6.66%5.95%4.71%4.29%2.32%4.37%3.51%3.96%5.12%

Financials

UHT vs. ABBV - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Universal Health Realty Income Trust and AbbVie Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B202220232024202520260
15.00B
(UHT) Total Revenue
(ABBV) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


UHT and ABBV have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UHT has higher volatility (9.89%) compared to ABBV (9.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UHT dropped -69.20% vs ABBV's -45.09%.

ABBV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs 0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UHT and ABBV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer