UHS vs. CTLT

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

UHS (Universal Health Services, Inc.) and CTLT (Catalent, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Healthcare sector — UHS in Medical Care Facilities, CTLT in Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

UHS vs. CTLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS) and Catalent, Inc. (CTLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

UHS

• 1D: -1.48%
• 1M: -14.64%
• YTD: -34.55%
• 6M: -40.22%
• 1Y: -23.70%
• 3Y*: 2.13%
• 5Y*: -1.66%
• 10Y*: 0.94%

CTLT

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UHS vs. CTLT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
UHS Universal Health Services, Inc.	-34.55%	22.02%	18.19%	8.83%	9.37%	-5.16%	-4.00%	23.62%	3.16%	6.93%
CTLT Catalent, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	41.29%	-0.18%	-64.84%	23.02%	84.85%	80.56%	-24.10%	52.37%

Correlation

The correlation between UHS and CTLT is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.08
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.18
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2014	0.26

The correlation between UHS and CTLT shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (3 years) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM) UHS : $17.76B CTLT : $4.42B
Gross Profit (TTM) UHS : $12.01B CTLT : $965.00M
EBITDA (TTM) UHS : $2.79B CTLT : $399.00M

Return for Risk

UHS vs. CTLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UHS

UHS Risk / Return Rank: 11
UHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
UHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
UHS Omega Ratio Rank: 11
UHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
UHS Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UHS vs. CTLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS) and Catalent, Inc. (CTLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UHS	CTLT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.75	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.89	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.88	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.60	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.56	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UHS	CTLT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.75	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.05	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.03	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	UHS	CTLT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.27%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-41.52%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-41.52%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.90%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-56.30%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-41.52%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.79%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.90%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	UHS	CTLT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.85%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.95%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.81%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.76%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.36%	—	—

Dividends

UHS vs. CTLT - Dividend Comparison

UHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, while CTLT has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CTLT Catalent, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UHS Universal Health Services, Inc.	0.42%	0.37%	0.45%	0.52%	0.57%	0.62%	0.15%	0.42%	0.34%	0.35%	0.38%	0.33%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UHS and CTLT in my portfolio?

UHS and CTLT have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.