PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
UHS vs. CTLT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between UHS and CTLT is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.3

Performance

UHS vs. CTLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS) and Catalent, Inc. (CTLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

100.00%150.00%200.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
76.42%
217.56%
UHS
CTLT

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

UHS:

0.79

CTLT:

2.58

Sortino Ratio

UHS:

1.24

CTLT:

4.35

Omega Ratio

UHS:

1.17

CTLT:

1.66

Calmar Ratio

UHS:

0.82

CTLT:

0.75

Martin Ratio

UHS:

2.66

CTLT:

12.40

Ulcer Index

UHS:

8.33%

CTLT:

4.28%

Daily Std Dev

UHS:

28.15%

CTLT:

20.54%

Max Drawdown

UHS:

-60.27%

CTLT:

-77.62%

Current Drawdown

UHS:

-25.35%

CTLT:

-55.41%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

UHS:

$12.05B

CTLT:

$11.52B

EPS

UHS:

$15.03

CTLT:

-$2.28

PEG Ratio

UHS:

1.87

CTLT:

529.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

UHS:

$15.42B

CTLT:

$4.42B

Gross Profit (TTM)

UHS:

$4.73B

CTLT:

$965.00M

EBITDA (TTM)

UHS:

$2.13B

CTLT:

$456.00M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UHS achieves a 18.64% return, which is significantly lower than CTLT's 41.29% return. Over the past 10 years, UHS has underperformed CTLT with an annualized return of 5.33%, while CTLT has yielded a comparatively higher 8.89% annualized return.


UHS

YTD

18.64%

1M

-8.77%

6M

-4.58%

1Y

18.14%

5Y*

5.12%

10Y*

5.33%

CTLT

YTD

41.29%

1M

7.59%

6M

12.35%

1Y

44.60%

5Y*

2.71%

10Y*

8.89%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

UHS vs. CTLT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS) and Catalent, Inc. (CTLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for UHS, currently valued at 0.79, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.000.792.52
The chart of Sortino ratio for UHS, currently valued at 1.24, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.244.34
The chart of Omega ratio for UHS, currently valued at 1.17, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.171.65
The chart of Calmar ratio for UHS, currently valued at 0.82, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.820.69
The chart of Martin ratio for UHS, currently valued at 2.66, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.002.6611.26
UHS
CTLT

The current UHS Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is lower than the CTLT Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UHS and CTLT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
0.79
2.52
UHS
CTLT

Dividends

UHS vs. CTLT - Dividend Comparison

UHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, while CTLT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
UHS
Universal Health Services, Inc.
0.44%0.52%0.57%0.62%0.15%0.42%0.34%0.35%0.38%0.33%0.27%0.25%
CTLT
Catalent, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

UHS vs. CTLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UHS drawdown since its inception was -60.27%, smaller than the maximum CTLT drawdown of -77.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UHS and CTLT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-25.35%
-55.41%
UHS
CTLT

Volatility

UHS vs. CTLT - Volatility Comparison

Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS) has a higher volatility of 6.80% compared to Catalent, Inc. (CTLT) at 3.16%. This indicates that UHS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CTLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
6.80%
3.16%
UHS
CTLT

Financials

UHS vs. CTLT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Universal Health Services, Inc. and Catalent, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab