UGL vs. COM
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Ultra Gold (UGL) and Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF (COM).
UGL and COM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UGL is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Gold bullion (200%). It was launched on Dec 1, 2008. COM is a passively managed fund by Direxion that tracks the performance of the Auspice Broad Commodity ER Index. It was launched on Mar 30, 2017. Both UGL and COM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: UGL or COM.
Correlation
The correlation between UGL and COM is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
UGL vs. COM - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
UGL:
1.92
COM:
1.22
UGL:
2.38
COM:
1.81
UGL:
1.31
COM:
1.22
UGL:
1.13
COM:
0.66
UGL:
9.28
COM:
3.12
UGL:
6.30%
COM:
2.84%
UGL:
30.48%
COM:
7.26%
UGL:
-75.93%
COM:
-15.95%
UGL:
-18.47%
COM:
-5.27%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UGL achieves a 6.03% return, which is significantly higher than COM's 2.79% return.
UGL
6.03%
3.79%
15.74%
61.46%
14.11%
8.33%
COM
2.79%
2.21%
1.59%
9.33%
9.66%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UGL vs. COM - Expense Ratio Comparison
UGL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than COM's 0.70% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
UGL vs. COM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
UGL
COM
UGL vs. COM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Gold (UGL) and Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF (COM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
UGL vs. COM - Dividend Comparison
UGL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UGL ProShares Ultra Gold | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
COM Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF | 3.77% | 3.87% | 3.80% | 8.59% | 10.32% | 0.13% | 1.09% | 2.36% | 0.09% |
Drawdowns
UGL vs. COM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UGL drawdown since its inception was -75.93%, which is greater than COM's maximum drawdown of -15.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UGL and COM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
UGL vs. COM - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Gold (UGL) has a higher volatility of 8.76% compared to Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF (COM) at 2.36%. This indicates that UGL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.