UGE vs. RTH
UGE (ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods) and RTH (VanEck Vectors Retail ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UGE is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Goods Index (200%), while RTH is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Retail 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UGE returned 7.82%/yr vs 13.87%/yr for RTH. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UGE charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for RTH.
Performance
UGE vs. RTH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UGE achieves a 9.62% return, which is significantly higher than RTH's 1.87% return. Over the past 10 years, UGE has underperformed RTH with an annualized return of 7.82%, while RTH has yielded a comparatively higher 13.87% annualized return.
UGE
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- -3.75%
- YTD
- 9.62%
- 6M
- 7.75%
- 1Y
- -3.53%
- 3Y*
- 4.80%
- 5Y*
- -2.85%
- 10Y*
- 7.82%
RTH
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- -4.91%
- YTD
- 1.87%
- 6M
- 1.10%
- 1Y
- 7.77%
- 3Y*
- 16.09%
- 5Y*
- 9.36%
- 10Y*
- 13.87%
UGE vs. RTH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UGE ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods | 9.62% | -5.21% | 16.40% | 2.38% | -46.78% | 42.44% | 56.64% | 58.28% | -30.14% | 32.38% |
RTH VanEck Vectors Retail ETF | 1.87% | 12.36% | 20.02% | 20.07% | -17.67% | 24.94% | 31.62% | 29.06% | 3.87% | 22.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between UGE and RTH is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2007 | 0.62 |
The correlation between UGE and RTH shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.65 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
UGE vs. RTH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UGE
RTH
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Defensive
UGE
RTH
Consumer Cyclical
UGE
RTH
Basic Materials
UGE
-
RTH
-
Communication Services
UGE
-
RTH
-
Energy
UGE
-
RTH
-
Financial Services
UGE
-
RTH
-
Healthcare
UGE
-
RTH
Industrials
UGE
-
RTH
Real Estate
UGE
-
RTH
-
Technology
UGE
-
RTH
-
Utilities
UGE
-
RTH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UGE vs. RTH — Risk / Return Rank
UGE
RTH
UGE vs. RTH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods (UGE) and VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UGE | RTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.12 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.19 | 1.00 | -1.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.34 | 3.46 | -3.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UGE | RTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 | 0.65 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.09 | 0.56 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 | 0.79 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.50 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
UGE vs. RTH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UGE drawdown since its inception was -71.36%, which is greater than RTH's maximum drawdown of -42.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UGE and RTH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UGE | RTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.36% | -42.32% | -29.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.95% | -7.83% | -11.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.80% | -13.80% | -11.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.55% | -25.00% | -31.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.14% | -25.00% | -32.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.07% | -5.85% | -32.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.73% | -7.34% | -11.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.47% | 2.26% | +8.21% |
Volatility
UGE vs. RTH - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods (UGE) has a higher volatility of 7.62% compared to VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH) at 3.83%. This indicates that UGE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RTH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UGE | RTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.62% | 3.83% | +3.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.47% | 9.22% | +10.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.97% | 12.07% | +12.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.31% | 16.81% | +14.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.08% | 17.54% | +15.54% |
UGE vs. RTH - Expense Ratio Comparison
UGE has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than RTH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
UGE vs. RTH - Dividend Comparison
UGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, more than RTH's 0.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RTH VanEck Vectors Retail ETF | 0.95% | 0.97% | 0.77% | 1.07% | 1.16% | 0.78% | 0.64% | 0.91% | 1.05% | 1.56% | 1.84% | 2.25% |
UGE ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods | 2.22% | 2.54% | 1.43% | 1.20% | 0.74% | 0.20% | 0.41% | 0.86% | 0.76% | 0.68% | 0.76% | 0.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UGE and RTH have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UGE has higher volatility (7.62%) compared to RTH (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UGE dropped -71.36% vs RTH's -42.32%.
On 10-year performance, RTH leads with 13.87% vs 7.82% for UGE. On fees, RTH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, RTH has been the lower-risk option at 3.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, RTH has performed better with a 13.87% return vs 7.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RTH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UGE.
UGE has the higher dividend yield at 2.22%, compared with 0.95% for RTH.
UGE is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while RTH is Consumer Discretionary Equities. UGE tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Goods Index (200%), while RTH tracks MVIS US Listed Retail 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UGE and 0.35% for RTH.
RTH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.65 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UGE and RTH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer