UGE vs. RTH
UGE (ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods) and RTH (VanEck Vectors Retail ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UGE is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Goods Index (200%), while RTH is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Retail 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UGE returned 8.70%/yr vs 14.29%/yr for RTH. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UGE charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for RTH.
Performance
UGE vs. RTH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UGE achieves a 15.44% return, which is significantly higher than RTH's 3.40% return. Over the past 10 years, UGE has underperformed RTH with an annualized return of 8.70%, while RTH has yielded a comparatively higher 14.29% annualized return.
UGE
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- -1.21%
- YTD
- 15.44%
- 6M
- 14.18%
- 1Y
- 4.33%
- 3Y*
- 6.07%
- 5Y*
- -2.24%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
RTH
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- -2.16%
- YTD
- 3.40%
- 6M
- 2.34%
- 1Y
- 10.49%
- 3Y*
- 15.57%
- 5Y*
- 9.21%
- 10Y*
- 14.29%
UGE vs. RTH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UGE ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods | 15.44% | -5.21% | 16.40% | 2.38% | -46.78% | 42.44% | 56.64% | 58.28% | -30.14% | 32.38% |
RTH VanEck Vectors Retail ETF | 3.40% | 12.36% | 20.02% | 20.07% | -17.67% | 24.94% | 31.62% | 29.06% | 3.87% | 22.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between UGE and RTH is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2007 | 0.61 |
The correlation between UGE and RTH shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
UGE vs. RTH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UGE
RTH
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Defensive
UGE
RTH
Consumer Cyclical
UGE
RTH
Basic Materials
UGE
-
RTH
-
Communication Services
UGE
-
RTH
-
Energy
UGE
-
RTH
-
Financial Services
UGE
-
RTH
-
Healthcare
UGE
-
RTH
Industrials
UGE
-
RTH
Real Estate
UGE
-
RTH
-
Technology
UGE
-
RTH
-
Utilities
UGE
-
RTH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UGE vs. RTH — Risk / Return Rank
UGE
RTH
UGE vs. RTH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods (UGE) and VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UGE | RTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.15 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.23 | 1.35 | -1.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.40 | 4.24 | -3.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UGE vs. RTH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UGE drawdown since its inception was -71.36%, which is greater than RTH's maximum drawdown of -42.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UGE and RTH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UGE | RTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.36% | -42.32% | -29.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.95% | -7.83% | -11.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.80% | -13.80% | -11.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.55% | -25.00% | -31.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.14% | -25.00% | -32.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.78% | -4.44% | -30.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.78% | -7.33% | -11.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.88% | 2.48% | +8.40% |
Volatility
UGE vs. RTH - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods (UGE) has a higher volatility of 10.37% compared to VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH) at 4.75%. This indicates that UGE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RTH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UGE | RTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.37% | 4.75% | +5.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.94% | 9.76% | +11.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.98% | 12.40% | +13.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.48% | 16.86% | +14.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.12% | 17.57% | +15.55% |
UGE vs. RTH - Expense Ratio Comparison
UGE has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than RTH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
UGE vs. RTH - Dividend Comparison
UGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%, more than RTH's 0.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RTH VanEck Vectors Retail ETF | 0.94% | 0.97% | 0.77% | 1.07% | 1.16% | 0.78% | 0.64% | 0.91% | 1.05% | 1.56% | 1.84% | 2.25% |
UGE ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods | 2.11% | 2.54% | 1.43% | 1.20% | 0.74% | 0.20% | 0.41% | 0.86% | 0.76% | 0.68% | 0.76% | 0.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UGE and RTH have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UGE has higher volatility (10.37%) compared to RTH (4.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UGE dropped -71.36% vs RTH's -42.32%.
On 10-year performance, RTH leads with 14.29% vs 8.70% for UGE. On fees, RTH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, RTH has been the lower-risk option at 4.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, RTH has performed better with a 14.29% return vs 8.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RTH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UGE.
UGE has the higher dividend yield at 2.11%, compared with 0.94% for RTH.
UGE is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while RTH is Consumer Discretionary Equities. UGE tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Goods Index (200%), while RTH tracks MVIS US Listed Retail 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UGE and 0.35% for RTH.
RTH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.85 vs 0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UGE and RTH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer