PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UFPI vs. BXC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

UFPI vs. BXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UFP Industries, Inc. (UFPI) and BlueLinx Holdings Inc. (BXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UFPI achieves a -5.41% return, which is significantly higher than BXC's -9.62% return. Over the past 10 years, UFPI has underperformed BXC with an annualized return of 12.72%, while BXC has yielded a comparatively higher 22.66% annualized return.


UFPI

1D
-1.32%
1M
6.56%
YTD
-5.41%
6M
-7.09%
1Y
-9.95%
3Y*
-0.50%
5Y*
4.69%
10Y*
12.72%

BXC

1D
-3.54%
1M
13.65%
YTD
-9.62%
6M
-8.79%
1Y
-19.23%
3Y*
-14.76%
5Y*
4.04%
10Y*
22.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UFPI vs. BXC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UFPI
UFP Industries, Inc.
-5.41%-18.03%-9.30%60.27%-12.85%67.07%17.59%85.60%-30.20%11.49%
BXC
BlueLinx Holdings Inc.
-9.62%-39.87%-9.84%59.34%-25.74%227.27%105.33%-42.33%153.18%30.66%

Correlation

The correlation between UFPI and BXC is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2004

0.39

Over the past year, UFPI and BXC have become more correlated (0.73) than their long-term average of 0.39, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

EPS

UFPI:

$4.62

BXC:

-$0.68

PS Ratio

UFPI:

0.79

BXC:

0.11

Total Revenue (TTM)

UFPI:

$6.19B

BXC:

$2.98B

Gross Profit (TTM)

UFPI:

$1.03B

BXC:

$447.15M

EBITDA (TTM)

UFPI:

$524.99M

BXC:

$79.53M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UFPI vs. BXC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UFPI
UFPI Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
UFPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UFPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
UFPI Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
UFPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
UFPI Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

BXC
BXC Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
BXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
BXC Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
BXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
BXC Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UFPI vs. BXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UFP Industries, Inc. (UFPI) and BlueLinx Holdings Inc. (BXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UFPIBXCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

0.99

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.32

-0.41

+0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.62

-0.72

+0.10

UFPI vs. BXC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UFPI Sharpe Ratio is -0.33, which is comparable to the BXC Sharpe Ratio of -0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UFPI and BXC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UFPI vs. BXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UFPI drawdown since its inception was -80.64%, smaller than the maximum BXC drawdown of -97.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UFPI and BXC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UFPIBXCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.64%

-97.46%

+16.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.29%

-47.62%

+16.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.90%

-65.56%

+23.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.90%

-65.56%

+23.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.75%

-91.71%

+45.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.02%

-57.89%

+20.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.28%

-65.96%

+40.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.01%

26.62%

-10.61%

Volatility

UFPI vs. BXC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UFP Industries, Inc. (UFPI) is 7.54%, while BlueLinx Holdings Inc. (BXC) has a volatility of 13.73%. This indicates that UFPI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UFPIBXCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.54%

13.73%

-6.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.97%

47.30%

-25.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.89%

59.36%

-29.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.72%

56.22%

-23.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.02%

70.27%

-35.25%

Dividends

UFPI vs. BXC - Dividend Comparison

UFPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, while BXC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BXC
BlueLinx Holdings Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UFPI
UFP Industries, Inc.
1.66%1.54%1.17%0.88%1.20%0.71%0.90%0.84%1.39%0.85%0.85%1.20%

Financials

UFPI vs. BXC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between UFP Industries, Inc. and BlueLinx Holdings Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B20222023202420252026
1.46B
731.15M
(UFPI) Total Revenue
(BXC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

UFPI vs. BXC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between UFP Industries, Inc. and BlueLinx Holdings Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

14.0%16.0%18.0%20.0%22.0%20222023202420252026
16.1%
15.9%
Portfolio components
UFPI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UFP Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 235.89M and revenue of 1.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.1%.

BXC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BlueLinx Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 116.40M and revenue of 731.15M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.9%.

UFPI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UFP Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 62.43M and revenue of 1.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.3%.

BXC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BlueLinx Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 7.33M and revenue of 731.15M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.0%.

UFPI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UFP Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 50.77M and revenue of 1.46B, resulting in a net margin of 3.5%.

BXC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BlueLinx Holdings Inc. reported a net income of -1.46M and revenue of 731.15M, resulting in a net margin of -0.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


UFPI and BXC have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BXC has higher volatility (13.73%) compared to UFPI (7.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UFPI dropped -80.64% vs BXC's -97.46%.

BXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.33 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UFPI and BXC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer