PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
UEC vs. FNGU
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between UEC and FNGU is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

UEC vs. FNGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Uranium Energy Corp. (UEC) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
31.75%
68.60%
UEC
FNGU

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

UEC:

-0.26

FNGU:

1.67

Sortino Ratio

UEC:

0.04

FNGU:

2.09

Omega Ratio

UEC:

1.01

FNGU:

1.28

Calmar Ratio

UEC:

-0.34

FNGU:

2.62

Martin Ratio

UEC:

-0.85

FNGU:

6.93

Ulcer Index

UEC:

19.17%

FNGU:

17.81%

Daily Std Dev

UEC:

63.15%

FNGU:

74.03%

Max Drawdown

UEC:

-97.40%

FNGU:

-92.34%

Current Drawdown

UEC:

-25.70%

FNGU:

-1.26%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UEC achieves a -4.48% return, which is significantly lower than FNGU's 17.59% return.


UEC

YTD

-4.48%

1M

-8.45%

6M

31.75%

1Y

-15.14%

5Y*

48.32%

10Y*

15.78%

FNGU

YTD

17.59%

1M

15.57%

6M

68.60%

1Y

109.84%

5Y*

46.89%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

UEC vs. FNGU — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UEC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of UEC is 2929
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of UEC is 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of UEC is 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of UEC is 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of UEC is 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of UEC is 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

FNGU
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FNGU is 6565
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FNGU is 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FNGU is 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FNGU is 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FNGU is 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FNGU is 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

UEC vs. FNGU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Uranium Energy Corp. (UEC) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for UEC, currently valued at -0.26, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.00-0.261.67
The chart of Sortino ratio for UEC, currently valued at 0.04, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.042.09
The chart of Omega ratio for UEC, currently valued at 1.00, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.011.28
The chart of Calmar ratio for UEC, currently valued at -0.34, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.342.62
The chart of Martin ratio for UEC, currently valued at -0.85, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-0.856.93
UEC
FNGU

The current UEC Sharpe Ratio is -0.26, which is lower than the FNGU Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UEC and FNGU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-0.26
1.67
UEC
FNGU

Dividends

UEC vs. FNGU - Dividend Comparison

Neither UEC nor FNGU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

UEC vs. FNGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UEC drawdown since its inception was -97.40%, which is greater than FNGU's maximum drawdown of -92.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UEC and FNGU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-25.70%
-1.26%
UEC
FNGU

Volatility

UEC vs. FNGU - Volatility Comparison

Uranium Energy Corp. (UEC) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU) have volatilities of 20.34% and 20.98%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%35.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
20.34%
20.98%
UEC
FNGU
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab