UCO vs. TQQQ
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ).
UCO and TQQQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UCO is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones-UBS Crude Oil Sub-Index (200%). It was launched on Nov 24, 2008. TQQQ is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). It was launched on Feb 9, 2010. Both UCO and TQQQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: UCO or TQQQ.
Correlation
The correlation between UCO and TQQQ is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
UCO vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
UCO:
-0.13
TQQQ:
1.23
UCO:
0.12
TQQQ:
1.72
UCO:
1.01
TQQQ:
1.23
UCO:
-0.06
TQQQ:
1.40
UCO:
-0.37
TQQQ:
5.25
UCO:
16.33%
TQQQ:
12.54%
UCO:
45.14%
TQQQ:
53.39%
UCO:
-99.95%
TQQQ:
-81.66%
UCO:
-99.58%
TQQQ:
-12.01%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UCO achieves a -0.46% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 63.64% return. Over the past 10 years, UCO has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of -28.60%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 35.21% annualized return.
UCO
-0.46%
-0.50%
-21.32%
-9.03%
-27.01%
-28.60%
TQQQ
63.64%
8.34%
7.50%
63.33%
31.98%
35.21%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UCO vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both UCO and TQQQ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
UCO vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
UCO vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison
UCO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UCO ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 1.16% | 1.26% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.03% |
Drawdowns
UCO vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UCO drawdown since its inception was -99.95%, which is greater than TQQQ's maximum drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UCO and TQQQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
UCO vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO) is 10.36%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 15.91%. This indicates that UCO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.