UBUT.DE vs. SXR8.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UBUT.DE) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SXR8.DE).
UBUT.DE and SXR8.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UBUT.DE is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA Quality. It was launched on Aug 26, 2015. SXR8.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on May 19, 2010. Both UBUT.DE and SXR8.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: UBUT.DE or SXR8.DE.
Key characteristics
| UBUT.DE | SXR8.DE | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 28.86% | 32.29% |
| 1Y Return | 34.46% | 38.38% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 11.72% | 12.72% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 17.08% | 16.33% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.49 | 3.23 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.37 | 4.36 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.46 | 1.67 |
| Calmar Ratio | 3.49 | 4.66 |
| Martin Ratio | 12.69 | 20.74 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.78% | 1.86% |
| Daily Std Dev | 14.05% | 11.86% |
| Max Drawdown | -30.47% | -33.78% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between UBUT.DE and SXR8.DE is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
UBUT.DE vs. SXR8.DE - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, UBUT.DE achieves a 28.86% return, which is significantly lower than SXR8.DE's 32.29% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UBUT.DE vs. SXR8.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
UBUT.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SXR8.DE's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
UBUT.DE vs. SXR8.DE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UBUT.DE) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SXR8.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
UBUT.DE vs. SXR8.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither UBUT.DE nor SXR8.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UBUT.DE UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 0.00% | 0.36% | 0.78% | 0.62% | 0.88% | 0.66% | 1.07% | 0.85% | 0.96% |
SXR8.DE iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
UBUT.DE vs. SXR8.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UBUT.DE drawdown since its inception was -30.47%, smaller than the maximum SXR8.DE drawdown of -33.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBUT.DE and SXR8.DE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
UBUT.DE vs. SXR8.DE - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UBUT.DE) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SXR8.DE) have volatilities of 3.60% and 3.50%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.