UBS vs. BAC
Compare and contrast key facts about UBS Group AG (UBS) and Bank of America Corporation (BAC).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: UBS or BAC.
Correlation
The correlation between UBS and BAC is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
UBS vs. BAC - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
UBS:
0.96
BAC:
2.00
UBS:
1.43
BAC:
2.94
UBS:
1.19
BAC:
1.36
UBS:
1.65
BAC:
1.50
UBS:
4.19
BAC:
8.12
UBS:
5.79%
BAC:
5.63%
UBS:
25.28%
BAC:
22.87%
UBS:
-59.82%
BAC:
-93.45%
UBS:
-1.23%
BAC:
-3.61%
Fundamentals
UBS:
$110.45B
BAC:
$348.50B
UBS:
$1.28
BAC:
$3.21
UBS:
27.09
BAC:
14.26
UBS:
0.40
BAC:
2.03
UBS:
$35.26B
BAC:
$123.51B
UBS:
$35.26B
BAC:
$37.82B
UBS:
$10.43B
BAC:
$46.02B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UBS achieves a 14.35% return, which is significantly higher than BAC's 4.19% return. Over the past 10 years, UBS has underperformed BAC with an annualized return of 12.90%, while BAC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.66% annualized return.
UBS
14.35%
14.46%
15.57%
24.61%
28.90%
12.90%
BAC
4.19%
4.33%
9.85%
43.29%
9.14%
13.66%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
UBS vs. BAC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
UBS
BAC
UBS vs. BAC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS Group AG (UBS) and Bank of America Corporation (BAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
UBS vs. BAC - Dividend Comparison
UBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.03%, more than BAC's 2.18% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UBS UBS Group AG | 3.03% | 3.46% | 1.78% | 2.68% | 2.07% | 10.34% | 5.48% | 5.24% | 3.30% | 9.41% | 4.11% | 0.00% |
BAC Bank of America Corporation | 2.18% | 2.28% | 2.73% | 2.60% | 1.75% | 2.38% | 1.87% | 2.19% | 1.32% | 1.13% | 1.19% | 0.67% |
Drawdowns
UBS vs. BAC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UBS drawdown since its inception was -59.82%, smaller than the maximum BAC drawdown of -93.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBS and BAC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
UBS vs. BAC - Volatility Comparison
UBS Group AG (UBS) has a higher volatility of 6.45% compared to Bank of America Corporation (BAC) at 5.80%. This indicates that UBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
UBS vs. BAC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between UBS Group AG and Bank of America Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities