PortfoliosLab logo
UBER vs. EPAM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between UBER and EPAM is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

UBER vs. EPAM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) and EPAM Systems, Inc. (EPAM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

UBER:

0.79

EPAM:

-0.11

Sortino Ratio

UBER:

1.43

EPAM:

0.10

Omega Ratio

UBER:

1.18

EPAM:

1.01

Calmar Ratio

UBER:

1.18

EPAM:

-0.07

Martin Ratio

UBER:

2.57

EPAM:

-0.30

Ulcer Index

UBER:

14.04%

EPAM:

18.93%

Daily Std Dev

UBER:

43.70%

EPAM:

42.18%

Max Drawdown

UBER:

-68.05%

EPAM:

-80.02%

Current Drawdown

UBER:

-4.82%

EPAM:

-74.82%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

UBER:

$185.42B

EPAM:

$10.40B

EPS

UBER:

$5.71

EPAM:

$7.14

PE Ratio

UBER:

15.53

EPAM:

25.71

PEG Ratio

UBER:

14.55

EPAM:

2.14

PS Ratio

UBER:

4.09

EPAM:

2.14

PB Ratio

UBER:

8.44

EPAM:

2.89

Total Revenue (TTM)

UBER:

$45.38B

EPAM:

$4.86B

Gross Profit (TTM)

UBER:

$17.11B

EPAM:

$1.45B

EBITDA (TTM)

UBER:

$6.95B

EPAM:

$675.00M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UBER achieves a 45.89% return, which is significantly higher than EPAM's -22.75% return.


UBER

YTD

45.89%

1M

18.22%

6M

26.36%

1Y

34.39%

3Y*

54.68%

5Y*

20.37%

10Y*

N/A

EPAM

YTD

-22.75%

1M

22.55%

6M

-26.34%

1Y

-4.62%

3Y*

-16.89%

5Y*

-4.17%

10Y*

10.51%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Uber Technologies, Inc.

EPAM Systems, Inc.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

UBER vs. EPAM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UBER
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of UBER is 7878
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of UBER is 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of UBER is 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of UBER is 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of UBER is 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of UBER is 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

EPAM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EPAM is 4343
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EPAM is 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EPAM is 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EPAM is 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EPAM is 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EPAM is 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

UBER vs. EPAM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) and EPAM Systems, Inc. (EPAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current UBER Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is higher than the EPAM Sharpe Ratio of -0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UBER and EPAM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

UBER vs. EPAM - Dividend Comparison

Neither UBER nor EPAM has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

UBER vs. EPAM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UBER drawdown since its inception was -68.05%, smaller than the maximum EPAM drawdown of -80.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBER and EPAM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

UBER vs. EPAM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) is 11.54%, while EPAM Systems, Inc. (EPAM) has a volatility of 14.17%. This indicates that UBER experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EPAM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

UBER vs. EPAM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Uber Technologies, Inc. and EPAM Systems, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B20212022202320242025
11.53B
1.30B
(UBER) Total Revenue
(EPAM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

UBER vs. EPAM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Uber Technologies, Inc. and EPAM Systems, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%55.0%20212022202320242025
39.9%
26.9%
(UBER) Gross Margin
(EPAM) Gross Margin
UBER - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Uber Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.60B and revenue of 11.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.9%.

EPAM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, EPAM Systems, Inc. reported a gross profit of 349.68M and revenue of 1.30B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.9%.

UBER - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Uber Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.23B and revenue of 11.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.7%.

EPAM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, EPAM Systems, Inc. reported an operating income of 99.33M and revenue of 1.30B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.6%.

UBER - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Uber Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 1.78B and revenue of 11.53B, resulting in a net margin of 15.4%.

EPAM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, EPAM Systems, Inc. reported a net income of 73.48M and revenue of 1.30B, resulting in a net margin of 5.7%.