UAN vs. VGT

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

UAN (CVR Partners, LP) is a stock, while VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Over the past 10 years, UAN returned 13.02%/yr vs 25.39%/yr for VGT. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

UAN vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CVR Partners, LP (UAN) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UAN achieves a 9.26% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 22.32% return. Over the past 10 years, UAN has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 13.02%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 25.39% annualized return.

UAN

• 1D: -1.81%
• 1M: -13.69%
• YTD: 9.26%
• 6M: 15.71%
• 1Y: 35.00%
• 3Y*: 22.56%
• 5Y*: 32.15%
• 10Y*: 13.02%

VGT

• 1D: -0.81%
• 1M: -0.54%
• YTD: 22.32%
• 6M: 20.31%
• 1Y: 43.06%
• 3Y*: 29.77%
• 5Y*: 19.33%
• 10Y*: 25.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UAN vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
UAN CVR Partners, LP	9.26%	54.09%	27.18%	-13.80%	43.68%	452.88%	-48.32%	1.48%	3.66%	-45.19%
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF	22.32%	21.77%	29.30%	52.66%	-29.70%	30.45%	46.04%	48.62%	2.46%	37.08%

Correlation

The correlation between UAN and VGT is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.07
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.15
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2011	0.19

The correlation between UAN and VGT shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

UAN vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UAN

UAN Risk / Return Rank: 71
UAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
UAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
UAN Omega Ratio Rank: 69
UAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
UAN Martin Ratio Rank: 77

VGT

VGT Risk / Return Rank: 58
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 58
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UAN vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CVR Partners, LP (UAN) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UAN	VGT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.87	1.91	-1.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.42	2.44	-1.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.32	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.78	2.64	-0.86
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.99	8.02	-3.03

UAN vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UAN Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is lower than the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UAN and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

UAN vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UAN drawdown since its inception was -96.77%, which is greater than VGT's maximum drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UAN and VGT.

Drawdown Indicators

	UAN	VGT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.77%	-54.63%	-42.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.73%	-16.40%	-3.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.52%	-27.23%	-1.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-49.19%	-35.07%	-14.12%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-91.74%	-35.07%	-56.67%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.73%	-8.46%	-11.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-47.48%	-7.95%	-39.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.03%	5.39%	+1.64%

Volatility

UAN vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CVR Partners, LP (UAN) is 4.68%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 11.37%. This indicates that UAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UAN	VGT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.68%	11.37%	-6.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.82%	18.52%	+19.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.38%	22.73%	+17.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.52%	25.55%	+16.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	54.68%	24.76%	+29.92%

Dividends

UAN vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

UAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.37%, more than VGT's 0.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
UAN CVR Partners, LP	11.37%	11.63%	8.81%	40.64%	19.21%	5.62%	0.00%	12.90%	0.00%	0.61%	11.81%	15.61%
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF	0.33%	0.40%	0.60%	0.65%	0.91%	0.64%	0.82%	1.11%	1.29%	0.99%	1.31%	1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UAN and VGT in my portfolio?

UAN and VGT have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UAN or VGT?

VGT has higher volatility (11.37%) compared to UAN (4.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UAN dropped -96.77% vs VGT's -54.63%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.