PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UAA vs. NOK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

UAA vs. NOK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Under Armour, Inc. (UAA) and Nokia Corporation (NOK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UAA achieves a 9.26% return, which is significantly lower than NOK's 162.99% return. Over the past 10 years, UAA has underperformed NOK with an annualized return of -17.33%, while NOK has yielded a comparatively higher 14.47% annualized return.


UAA

1D
-1.99%
1M
-13.67%
YTD
9.26%
6M
19.08%
1Y
-16.59%
3Y*
-11.52%
5Y*
-24.51%
10Y*
-17.33%

NOK

1D
3.69%
1M
26.69%
YTD
162.99%
6M
174.88%
1Y
225.76%
3Y*
65.99%
5Y*
28.29%
10Y*
14.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UAA vs. NOK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UAA
Under Armour, Inc.
9.26%-39.98%-5.80%-13.48%-52.05%23.41%-20.51%22.24%22.45%-50.33%
NOK
Nokia Corporation
162.99%50.85%34.33%-23.97%-24.44%59.08%5.39%-34.91%30.04%-0.22%

Correlation

The correlation between UAA and NOK is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2005

0.29

The correlation between UAA and NOK shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.36 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

UAA:

$2.31B

NOK:

$96.43B

EPS

UAA:

-$1.16

NOK:

$0.14

PS Ratio

UAA:

0.47

NOK:

4.68

PB Ratio

UAA:

1.64

NOK:

4.55

Total Revenue (TTM)

UAA:

$4.97B

NOK:

$20.00B

Gross Profit (TTM)

UAA:

$2.26B

NOK:

$8.82B

EBITDA (TTM)

UAA:

-$36.44M

NOK:

$2.24B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UAA vs. NOK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UAA
UAA Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
UAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
UAA Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
UAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
UAA Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

NOK
NOK Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
NOK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOK Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOK Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
NOK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOK Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UAA vs. NOK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Under Armour, Inc. (UAA) and Nokia Corporation (NOK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UAANOKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.30

4.47

-4.78

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.08

5.03

-5.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.66

-0.67

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.44

9.41

-9.85

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.71

18.43

-19.14

UAA vs. NOK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UAA Sharpe Ratio is -0.30, which is lower than the NOK Sharpe Ratio of 4.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UAA and NOK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UAANOKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.30

4.47

-4.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.47

0.78

-1.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.33

0.36

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

0.20

-0.14

Drawdowns

UAA vs. NOK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UAA drawdown since its inception was -91.99%, roughly equal to the maximum NOK drawdown of -95.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UAA and NOK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UAANOKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.99%

-95.99%

+4.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.42%

-24.59%

-18.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-62.53%

-29.74%

-32.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-84.53%

-50.56%

-33.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-90.43%

-62.56%

-27.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-89.57%

-43.18%

-46.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.70%

-64.87%

+19.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.93%

12.55%

+14.38%

Volatility

UAA vs. NOK - Volatility Comparison

Under Armour, Inc. (UAA) and Nokia Corporation (NOK) have volatilities of 23.01% and 23.89%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UAANOKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.01%

23.89%

-0.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.30%

37.32%

+5.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.68%

50.83%

+3.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.73%

36.43%

+16.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.12%

40.22%

+11.90%

Dividends

UAA vs. NOK - Dividend Comparison

UAA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NOK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NOK
Nokia Corporation
0.97%2.45%3.17%3.51%1.32%0.00%0.00%3.01%4.06%4.07%6.02%2.22%
UAA
Under Armour, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

UAA vs. NOK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Under Armour, Inc. and Nokia Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B20222023202420252026
1.17B
4.50B
(UAA) Total Revenue
(NOK) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

UAA vs. NOK - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Under Armour, Inc. and Nokia Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

38.0%40.0%42.0%44.0%46.0%48.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
42.0%
44.2%
Portfolio components
UAA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Under Armour, Inc. reported a gross profit of 492.04M and revenue of 1.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.0%.

NOK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nokia Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.99B and revenue of 4.50B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.2%.

UAA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Under Armour, Inc. reported an operating income of -33.70M and revenue of 1.17B, resulting in an operating margin of -2.9%.

NOK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nokia Corporation reported an operating income of 63.00M and revenue of 4.50B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.4%.

UAA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Under Armour, Inc. reported a net income of -43.39M and revenue of 1.17B, resulting in a net margin of -3.7%.

NOK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nokia Corporation reported a net income of 86.00M and revenue of 4.50B, resulting in a net margin of 1.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


UAA and NOK have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NOK has higher volatility (23.89%) compared to UAA (23.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UAA dropped -91.99% vs NOK's -95.99%.

NOK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.47 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UAA and NOK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer