TZA vs. DOG
TZA (Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares) and DOG (ProShares Short Dow30) are both exchange-traded funds - TZA is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index (-300%), while DOG is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the DJ Industrial Average (-100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TZA returned -44.17%/yr vs -11.50%/yr for DOG. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TZA charges 1.11%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for DOG.
Performance
TZA vs. DOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TZA achieves a -46.35% return, which is significantly lower than DOG's -5.77% return. Over the past 10 years, TZA has underperformed DOG with an annualized return of -44.17%, while DOG has yielded a comparatively higher -11.50% annualized return.
TZA
- 1D
- 2.05%
- 1M
- -12.69%
- YTD
- -46.35%
- 6M
- -42.28%
- 1Y
- -67.58%
- 3Y*
- -46.88%
- 5Y*
- -30.52%
- 10Y*
- -44.17%
DOG
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- -2.00%
- YTD
- -5.77%
- 6M
- -4.85%
- 1Y
- -14.33%
- 3Y*
- -8.97%
- 5Y*
- -5.91%
- 10Y*
- -11.50%
TZA vs. DOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TZA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares | -46.35% | -40.22% | -32.22% | -41.19% | 30.21% | -50.80% | -80.43% | -53.25% | 25.06% | -38.19% |
DOG ProShares Short Dow30 | -5.77% | -8.40% | -5.62% | -7.05% | 5.67% | -19.21% | -20.45% | -18.43% | 3.55% | -21.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between TZA and DOG is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2008 | 0.80 |
The correlation between TZA and DOG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TZA vs. DOG — Risk / Return Rank
TZA
DOG
TZA vs. DOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares (TZA) and ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TZA | DOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 0.82 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.00 | -1.02 | +0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.56 | -1.82 | +0.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TZA vs. DOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TZA drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than DOG's maximum drawdown of -92.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TZA and DOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TZA | DOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -92.79% | -7.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -68.07% | -14.12% | -53.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -89.28% | -29.71% | -59.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -91.56% | -34.86% | -56.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.74% | -71.17% | -28.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -92.73% | -7.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -97.99% | -66.45% | -31.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 43.46% | 8.69% | +34.77% |
Volatility
TZA vs. DOG - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares (TZA) has a higher volatility of 19.17% compared to ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG) at 4.15%. This indicates that TZA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TZA | DOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.17% | 4.15% | +15.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.84% | 9.86% | +32.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.62% | 12.45% | +46.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.66% | 14.83% | +52.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.98% | 17.49% | +51.49% |
TZA vs. DOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
TZA has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than DOG's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
TZA vs. DOG - Dividend Comparison
TZA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.35%, more than DOG's 3.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DOG ProShares Short Dow30 | 3.55% | 3.65% | 5.72% | 4.54% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 1.54% | 0.86% | 0.04% |
TZA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares | 5.35% | 5.08% | 5.40% | 5.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.21% | 1.56% | 0.63% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TZA and DOG have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TZA has higher volatility (19.17%) compared to DOG (4.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TZA dropped -100.00% vs DOG's -92.79%.
On 10-year performance, DOG leads with -11.50% vs -44.17% for TZA. On fees, DOG is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, DOG has been the lower-risk option at 4.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DOG has performed better with a -11.50% return vs -44.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DOG is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.11% for TZA.
TZA has the higher dividend yield at 5.35%, compared with 3.55% for DOG.
TZA is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while DOG is Inverse Equities. TZA tracks Russell 2000 Index (-300%), while DOG tracks DJ Industrial Average (-100%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.11% for TZA and 0.95% for DOG.
TZA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.16 vs -1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TZA and DOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer