PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TYD vs. QYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TYD vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily 7-10 Year Treasury Bull 3X (TYD) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TYD achieves a -5.40% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 7.94% return. Over the past 10 years, TYD has underperformed QYLD with an annualized return of -4.63%, while QYLD has yielded a comparatively higher 9.80% annualized return.


TYD

1D
0.13%
1M
-1.42%
YTD
-5.40%
6M
-7.08%
1Y
1.17%
3Y*
-4.80%
5Y*
-12.47%
10Y*
-4.63%

QYLD

1D
0.11%
1M
1.62%
YTD
7.94%
6M
10.09%
1Y
24.45%
3Y*
13.82%
5Y*
8.61%
10Y*
9.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TYD vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TYD
Direxion Daily 7-10 Year Treasury Bull 3X
-5.40%11.68%-13.89%-2.87%-43.32%-11.36%27.62%17.88%0.76%5.64%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
7.94%9.28%19.35%22.77%-19.08%10.41%8.72%22.69%-3.07%18.79%

Correlation

The correlation between TYD and QYLD is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2013

-0.09

The correlation between TYD and QYLD shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (all time) to 0.15 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TYD vs. QYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TYD
QYLD

Financial Services

21.5%
0.2%

Basic Materials

-

1.1%

Communication Services

-

15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.7%

Energy

-

0.6%

Healthcare

-

4.2%

Industrials

-

2.8%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Technology

-

53.8%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Financial Services

TYD
21.5%
QYLD
0.2%

Basic Materials

TYD

-

QYLD
1.1%

Communication Services

TYD

-

QYLD
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

TYD

-

QYLD
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

TYD

-

QYLD
7.7%

Energy

TYD

-

QYLD
0.6%

Healthcare

TYD

-

QYLD
4.2%

Industrials

TYD

-

QYLD
2.8%

Real Estate

TYD

-

QYLD
0.1%

Technology

TYD

-

QYLD
53.8%

Utilities

TYD

-

QYLD
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TYD vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TYD
TYD Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
TYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
TYD Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
TYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
TYD Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

QYLD
QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TYD vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily 7-10 Year Treasury Bull 3X (TYD) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TYDQYLDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.08

2.86

-2.78

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.22

3.99

-3.77

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.64

-0.62

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.02

5.03

-5.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.05

29.54

-29.49

TYD vs. QYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TYD Sharpe Ratio is 0.08, which is lower than the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TYD and QYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TYDQYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

2.86

-2.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.55

0.59

-1.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.23

0.63

-0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

0.59

-0.54

Drawdowns

TYD vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TYD drawdown since its inception was -64.28%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TYD and QYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TYDQYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.28%

-24.75%

-39.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.54%

-4.97%

-8.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.04%

-19.06%

-5.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.84%

-24.61%

-35.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.28%

-24.75%

-39.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-58.89%

0.00%

-58.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.94%

-3.84%

-18.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.92%

0.85%

+4.07%

Volatility

TYD vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily 7-10 Year Treasury Bull 3X (TYD) has a higher volatility of 4.26% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 1.85%. This indicates that TYD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TYDQYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.26%

1.85%

+2.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.67%

7.12%

+2.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.13%

8.58%

+5.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.98%

14.70%

+8.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.37%

15.50%

+4.87%

TYD vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

TYD has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

TYD vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

TYD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, less than QYLD's 11.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
11.45%11.55%12.50%11.78%13.75%12.85%11.16%9.84%12.44%7.69%9.15%9.42%
TYD
Direxion Daily 7-10 Year Treasury Bull 3X
3.20%2.97%3.10%2.71%0.55%0.00%9.80%0.92%1.10%0.01%6.84%1.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


TYD and QYLD have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TYD has higher volatility (4.26%) compared to QYLD (1.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TYD dropped -64.28% vs QYLD's -24.75%.

On 10-year performance, QYLD leads with 9.80% vs -4.63% for TYD. On fees, QYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, QYLD has been the lower-risk option at 1.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QYLD has performed better with a 9.80% return vs -4.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for TYD.

QYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.45%, compared with 3.20% for TYD.

TYD is categorized as Leveraged Bonds, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. TYD tracks NYSE 7-10 Year Treasury Bond Index, while QYLD tracks CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.09% for TYD and 0.60% for QYLD.

QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TYD and QYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer