TXN vs. CRM

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

TXN (Texas Instruments Incorporated) and CRM (Salesforce, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — TXN in Semiconductors, CRM in Software - Application. Over the past 10 years, TXN returned 20.68%/yr vs 8.74%/yr for CRM. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

TXN vs. CRM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) and Salesforce, Inc. (CRM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TXN achieves a 78.06% return, which is significantly higher than CRM's -28.57% return. Over the past 10 years, TXN has outperformed CRM with an annualized return of 20.68%, while CRM has yielded a comparatively lower 8.74% annualized return.

TXN

• 1D: -1.04%
• 1M: 8.67%
• YTD: 78.06%
• 6M: 71.51%
• 1Y: 64.61%
• 3Y*: 25.10%
• 5Y*: 13.12%
• 10Y*: 20.68%

CRM

• 1D: -0.98%
• 1M: 0.94%
• YTD: -28.57%
• 6M: -23.41%
• 1Y: -27.74%
• 3Y*: -3.00%
• 5Y*: -4.21%
• 10Y*: 8.74%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TXN vs. CRM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TXN Texas Instruments Incorporated	78.06%	-4.47%	13.14%	6.41%	-9.86%	17.53%	31.70%	39.56%	-7.17%	46.75%
CRM Salesforce, Inc.	-28.57%	-20.25%	27.76%	98.46%	-47.83%	14.20%	36.82%	18.74%	33.98%	49.33%

Correlation

The correlation between TXN and CRM is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.21
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2004	0.43

The correlation between TXN and CRM shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.43 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap TXN : $279.11B CRM : $164.40B
EPS TXN : $5.88 CRM : $8.59
PE Ratio TXN : 51.96 CRM : 21.97
PS Ratio TXN : 15.13 CRM : 4.12
PB Ratio TXN : 16.64 CRM : 4.80
Total Revenue (TTM) TXN : $18.44B CRM : $42.83B
Gross Profit (TTM) TXN : $10.57B CRM : $33.25B
EBITDA (TTM) TXN : $8.21B CRM : $12.32B

Return for Risk

TXN vs. CRM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TXN

TXN Risk / Return Rank: 80
TXN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
TXN Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
TXN Omega Ratio Rank: 84
TXN Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
TXN Martin Ratio Rank: 74

CRM

CRM Risk / Return Rank: 13
CRM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
CRM Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
CRM Omega Ratio Rank: 14
CRM Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
CRM Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TXN vs. CRM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) and Salesforce, Inc. (CRM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TXN	CRM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.65	-0.73	+2.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.52	-0.90	+3.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	0.89	+0.45
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.20	-0.71	+2.90
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.60	-1.37	+5.97
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TXN vs. CRM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TXN Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is higher than the CRM Sharpe Ratio of -0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TXN and CRM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TXN	CRM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.65	-0.73	+2.39
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41	-0.11	+0.52
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.67	0.25	+0.42
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.30	0.45	-0.15

Drawdowns

TXN vs. CRM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TXN drawdown since its inception was -85.81%, which is greater than CRM's maximum drawdown of -70.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TXN and CRM.

Drawdown Indicators

	TXN	CRM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.81%	-70.50%	-15.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.57%	-39.46%	+9.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.41%	-54.70%	+21.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.41%	-58.62%	+25.21%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.41%	-58.62%	+25.21%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.01%	-48.17%	+42.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.79%	-16.11%	-18.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.07%	20.28%	-6.21%

Volatility

TXN vs. CRM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) is 12.17%, while Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) has a volatility of 17.33%. This indicates that TXN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TXN	CRM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.17%	17.33%	-5.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.34%	31.96%	-1.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.27%	37.88%	+1.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.18%	37.00%	-4.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.04%	35.33%	-4.29%

Dividends

TXN vs. CRM - Dividend Comparison

TXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, more than CRM's 0.89% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CRM Salesforce, Inc.	0.89%	0.63%	0.48%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TXN Texas Instruments Incorporated	1.84%	3.17%	2.81%	2.94%	2.84%	2.23%	2.27%	2.50%	2.78%	2.03%	2.25%	2.55%

Financials

TXN vs. CRM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Texas Instruments Incorporated and Salesforce, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

TXN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Texas Instruments Incorporated reported a gross profit of 2.80B and revenue of 4.83B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.0%.

CRM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Salesforce, Inc. reported a gross profit of 8.56B and revenue of 11.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.9%.

TXN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Texas Instruments Incorporated reported an operating income of 1.81B and revenue of 4.83B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.5%.

CRM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Salesforce, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.35B and revenue of 11.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.1%.

TXN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Texas Instruments Incorporated reported a net income of 1.55B and revenue of 4.83B, resulting in a net margin of 32.0%.

CRM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Salesforce, Inc. reported a net income of 2.11B and revenue of 11.13B, resulting in a net margin of 18.9%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TXN and CRM in my portfolio?

TXN and CRM have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TXN or CRM?

CRM has higher volatility (17.33%) compared to TXN (12.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TXN dropped -85.81% vs CRM's -70.50%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TXN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.