PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TXG vs. META
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TXG vs. META - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 10x Genomics, Inc. (TXG) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TXG achieves a 97.18% return, which is significantly higher than META's -5.54% return.


TXG

1D
4.72%
1M
48.55%
YTD
97.18%
6M
79.97%
1Y
253.02%
3Y*
-16.17%
5Y*
-29.15%
10Y*

META

1D
4.24%
1M
2.06%
YTD
-5.54%
6M
-2.44%
1Y
-6.29%
3Y*
32.06%
5Y*
13.70%
10Y*
18.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TXG vs. META - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TXG
10x Genomics, Inc.
97.18%13.58%-74.34%53.57%-75.54%5.20%85.70%44.55%
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
-5.54%13.09%66.05%194.13%-64.22%23.13%33.09%9.48%

Correlation

The correlation between TXG and META is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2019

0.32

The correlation between TXG and META shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.35 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TXG:

$4.13B

META:

$1.60T

EPS

TXG:

-$0.18

META:

$27.47

PS Ratio

TXG:

6.36

META:

7.45

PB Ratio

TXG:

5.07

META:

6.55

Total Revenue (TTM)

TXG:

$638.78M

META:

$214.96B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TXG:

$444.61M

META:

$176.14B

EBITDA (TTM)

TXG:

-$5.89M

META:

$106.31B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TXG vs. META — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TXG
TXG Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
TXG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TXG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
TXG Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
TXG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
TXG Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

META
META Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
META Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
META Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
META Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
META Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
META Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TXG vs. META - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 10x Genomics, Inc. (TXG) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TXGMETADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.00

+0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.15

-0.19

+9.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.17

-0.41

+21.58

TXG vs. META - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TXG Sharpe Ratio is 3.81, which is higher than the META Sharpe Ratio of -0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TXG and META, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TXGMETADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.81

-0.18

+3.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.43

0.31

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.11

0.56

-0.66

Drawdowns

TXG vs. META - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TXG drawdown since its inception was -96.47%, which is greater than META's maximum drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TXG and META.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TXGMETADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.47%

-76.74%

-19.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.03%

-33.30%

+5.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-88.66%

-34.15%

-54.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-96.45%

-76.74%

-19.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-84.11%

-20.96%

-63.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-59.62%

-15.25%

-44.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.08%

15.47%

-3.39%

Volatility

TXG vs. META - Volatility Comparison

10x Genomics, Inc. (TXG) has a higher volatility of 16.46% compared to Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) at 8.84%. This indicates that TXG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than META based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TXGMETADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.46%

8.84%

+7.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.64%

26.58%

+19.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

67.46%

35.23%

+32.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

68.25%

43.99%

+24.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

66.73%

38.64%

+28.09%

Dividends

TXG vs. META - Dividend Comparison

TXG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while META's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%.


PositionTTM20252024
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
0.34%0.32%0.34%
TXG
10x Genomics, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

TXG vs. META - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between 10x Genomics, Inc. and Meta Platforms, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B60.00B20222023202420252026
150.84M
56.31B
(TXG) Total Revenue
(META) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TXG vs. META - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between 10x Genomics, Inc. and Meta Platforms, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
70.4%
81.9%
Portfolio components
TXG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, 10x Genomics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 106.18M and revenue of 150.84M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.4%.

META - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a gross profit of 46.09B and revenue of 56.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.9%.

TXG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, 10x Genomics, Inc. reported an operating income of -17.05M and revenue of 150.84M, resulting in an operating margin of -11.3%.

META - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported an operating income of 22.87B and revenue of 56.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 40.6%.

TXG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, 10x Genomics, Inc. reported a net income of -13.47M and revenue of 150.84M, resulting in a net margin of -8.9%.

META - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a net income of 26.77B and revenue of 56.31B, resulting in a net margin of 47.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TXG and META have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TXG has higher volatility (16.46%) compared to META (8.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TXG dropped -96.47% vs META's -76.74%.

TXG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.81 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TXG and META

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer