PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TX vs. VALE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TX vs. VALE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ternium S.A. (TX) and Vale S.A. (VALE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TX achieves a 34.28% return, which is significantly higher than VALE's 23.25% return. Over the past 10 years, TX has underperformed VALE with an annualized return of 15.80%, while VALE has yielded a comparatively higher 21.28% annualized return.


TX

1D
-2.77%
1M
19.93%
YTD
34.28%
6M
33.41%
1Y
83.30%
3Y*
15.64%
5Y*
14.01%
10Y*
15.80%

VALE

1D
-4.52%
1M
1.39%
YTD
23.25%
6M
22.91%
1Y
81.55%
3Y*
14.29%
5Y*
2.79%
10Y*
21.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TX vs. VALE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TX
Ternium S.A.
34.28%43.56%-25.86%49.94%-24.80%60.96%32.18%-14.86%-11.86%36.48%
VALE
Vale S.A.
23.25%60.70%-38.83%1.57%32.54%-1.45%32.40%2.72%12.25%68.03%

Correlation

The correlation between TX and VALE is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2006

0.58

The correlation between TX and VALE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TX:

$9.78B

VALE:

$68.65B

EPS

TX:

$2.90

VALE:

$0.65

PE Ratio

TX:

17.15

VALE:

24.58

PS Ratio

TX:

0.63

VALE:

1.74

PB Ratio

TX:

0.80

VALE:

1.87

Total Revenue (TTM)

TX:

$15.58B

VALE:

$39.53B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TX:

$2.44B

VALE:

$13.65B

EBITDA (TTM)

TX:

$1.62B

VALE:

$14.33B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TX vs. VALE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TX
TX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
TX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
TX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
TX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
TX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

VALE
VALE Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
VALE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VALE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
VALE Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
VALE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
VALE Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TX vs. VALE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ternium S.A. (TX) and Vale S.A. (VALE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TXVALEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.41

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.88

4.13

+0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.92

14.77

+1.15

TX vs. VALE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TX Sharpe Ratio is 2.74, which is comparable to the VALE Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TX and VALE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TXVALEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.74

2.60

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.08

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.52

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

0.31

-0.14

Drawdowns

TX vs. VALE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TX drawdown since its inception was -89.66%, roughly equal to the maximum VALE drawdown of -92.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TX and VALE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TXVALEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.66%

-92.78%

+3.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.17%

-19.85%

+2.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.04%

-41.94%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.48%

-49.79%

+0.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.94%

-57.60%

-17.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.77%

-9.88%

+7.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.30%

-36.73%

+5.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.25%

5.54%

-0.29%

Volatility

TX vs. VALE - Volatility Comparison

Ternium S.A. (TX) has a higher volatility of 15.68% compared to Vale S.A. (VALE) at 9.10%. This indicates that TX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VALE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TXVALEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.68%

9.10%

+6.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.60%

26.50%

-2.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.52%

31.56%

-1.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.34%

35.41%

-0.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.92%

41.00%

-3.08%

Dividends

TX vs. VALE - Dividend Comparison

TX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.42%, more than VALE's 3.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TX
Ternium S.A.
4.42%7.07%10.66%6.83%8.84%6.66%0.00%5.45%4.06%3.17%3.73%7.24%
VALE
Vale S.A.
3.58%7.29%11.41%7.75%8.63%19.70%2.72%2.63%4.16%3.77%1.06%7.48%

Financials

TX vs. VALE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ternium S.A. and Vale S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B14.00B16.00B20222023202420252026
3.93B
9.26B
(TX) Total Revenue
(VALE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TX vs. VALE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ternium S.A. and Vale S.A. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
17.5%
33.0%
Portfolio components
TX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ternium S.A. reported a gross profit of 686.87M and revenue of 3.93B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.5%.

VALE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vale S.A. reported a gross profit of 3.06B and revenue of 9.26B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.0%.

TX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ternium S.A. reported an operating income of 290.07M and revenue of 3.93B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.4%.

VALE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vale S.A. reported an operating income of 2.67B and revenue of 9.26B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.8%.

TX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ternium S.A. reported a net income of 213.02M and revenue of 3.93B, resulting in a net margin of 5.4%.

VALE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vale S.A. reported a net income of 1.89B and revenue of 9.26B, resulting in a net margin of 20.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TX and VALE have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TX has higher volatility (15.68%) compared to VALE (9.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TX dropped -89.66% vs VALE's -92.78%.

TX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 2.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TX and VALE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer