PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
TX vs. RS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


TXRS
YTD Return-17.04%12.05%
1Y Return-2.85%15.32%
3Y Return (Ann)0.13%25.47%
5Y Return (Ann)18.66%24.51%
10Y Return (Ann)11.21%19.46%
Sharpe Ratio-0.090.53
Sortino Ratio0.061.10
Omega Ratio1.011.13
Calmar Ratio-0.080.78
Martin Ratio-0.181.37
Ulcer Index13.69%11.17%
Daily Std Dev26.45%28.65%
Max Drawdown-89.66%-83.80%
Current Drawdown-26.00%-8.15%

Fundamentals


TXRS
Market Cap$6.76B$17.31B
EPS$0.40$18.26
PE Ratio86.1017.51
PEG Ratio4.031.20
Total Revenue (TTM)$18.59B$14.05B
Gross Profit (TTM)$3.28B$1.26B
EBITDA (TTM)$2.46B$8.89B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between TX and RS is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

TX vs. RS - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, TX achieves a -17.04% return, which is significantly lower than RS's 12.05% return. Over the past 10 years, TX has underperformed RS with an annualized return of 11.21%, while RS has yielded a comparatively higher 19.46% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-22.42%
4.78%
TX
RS

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

TX vs. RS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ternium S.A. (TX) and Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for TX, currently valued at -0.09, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.09
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for TX, currently valued at 0.06, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.06
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for TX, currently valued at 1.01, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.01
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for TX, currently valued at -0.08, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.08
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for TX, currently valued at -0.18, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-0.18
RS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for RS, currently valued at 0.53, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.53
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for RS, currently valued at 1.10, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.10
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for RS, currently valued at 1.13, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.13
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for RS, currently valued at 0.78, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.78
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for RS, currently valued at 1.37, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.001.37

TX vs. RS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TX Sharpe Ratio is -0.09, which is lower than the RS Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TX and RS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.09
0.53
TX
RS

Dividends

TX vs. RS - Dividend Comparison

TX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.58%, more than RS's 1.39% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
TX
Ternium S.A.
6.58%6.83%8.84%6.66%4.13%5.45%4.06%3.17%3.73%7.24%4.25%2.08%
RS
Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.
1.39%1.43%1.73%1.70%2.09%1.84%2.81%2.10%2.07%2.76%2.28%2.06%

Drawdowns

TX vs. RS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TX drawdown since its inception was -89.66%, which is greater than RS's maximum drawdown of -83.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TX and RS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-26.00%
-8.15%
TX
RS

Volatility

TX vs. RS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ternium S.A. (TX) is 8.67%, while Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS) has a volatility of 14.70%. This indicates that TX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
8.67%
14.70%
TX
RS

Financials

TX vs. RS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ternium S.A. and Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items