PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TX vs. RIO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TX vs. RIO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ternium S.A. (TX) and Rio Tinto Group (RIO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TX achieves a 34.28% return, which is significantly lower than RIO's 38.54% return. Over the past 10 years, TX has underperformed RIO with an annualized return of 15.80%, while RIO has yielded a comparatively higher 22.38% annualized return.


TX

1D
-2.77%
1M
19.93%
YTD
34.28%
6M
33.41%
1Y
83.30%
3Y*
15.64%
5Y*
14.01%
10Y*
15.80%

RIO

1D
-3.41%
1M
9.36%
YTD
38.54%
6M
49.27%
1Y
92.97%
3Y*
27.11%
5Y*
11.69%
10Y*
22.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TX vs. RIO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TX
Ternium S.A.
34.28%43.56%-25.86%49.94%-24.80%60.96%32.18%-14.86%-11.86%36.48%
RIO
Rio Tinto Group
38.54%44.47%-15.36%11.06%18.48%-3.67%36.22%33.18%-2.93%44.87%

Correlation

The correlation between TX and RIO is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2006

0.56

The correlation between TX and RIO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TX:

$9.78B

RIO:

$176.72B

EPS

TX:

$2.90

RIO:

$13.11

PE Ratio

TX:

17.15

RIO:

8.23

PS Ratio

TX:

0.63

RIO:

1.59

PB Ratio

TX:

0.80

RIO:

2.84

Total Revenue (TTM)

TX:

$15.58B

RIO:

$111.41B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TX:

$2.44B

RIO:

$31.10B

EBITDA (TTM)

TX:

$1.62B

RIO:

$40.42B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TX vs. RIO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TX
TX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
TX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
TX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
TX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
TX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

RIO
RIO Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
RIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIO Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
RIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIO Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TX vs. RIO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ternium S.A. (TX) and Rio Tinto Group (RIO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TXRIODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.50

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.88

6.16

-1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.92

24.21

-8.30

TX vs. RIO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TX Sharpe Ratio is 2.74, which is comparable to the RIO Sharpe Ratio of 3.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TX and RIO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TXRIODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.74

3.29

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.40

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.73

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

0.34

-0.16

Drawdowns

TX vs. RIO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TX drawdown since its inception was -89.66%, roughly equal to the maximum RIO drawdown of -88.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TX and RIO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TXRIODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.66%

-88.97%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.17%

-15.19%

-1.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.04%

-24.19%

-17.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.48%

-35.25%

-14.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.94%

-37.47%

-37.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.77%

-3.73%

+0.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.30%

-23.78%

-7.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.25%

3.85%

+1.40%

Volatility

TX vs. RIO - Volatility Comparison

Ternium S.A. (TX) has a higher volatility of 15.68% compared to Rio Tinto Group (RIO) at 11.49%. This indicates that TX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RIO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TXRIODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.68%

11.49%

+4.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.60%

23.38%

+0.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.52%

28.44%

+2.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.34%

29.16%

+6.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.92%

30.66%

+7.26%

Dividends

TX vs. RIO - Dividend Comparison

TX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.42%, more than RIO's 3.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RIO
Rio Tinto Group
3.73%4.66%7.40%5.40%10.48%10.23%5.13%7.68%6.32%4.47%3.93%7.58%
TX
Ternium S.A.
4.42%7.07%10.66%6.83%8.84%6.66%0.00%5.45%4.06%3.17%3.73%7.24%

Financials

TX vs. RIO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ternium S.A. and Rio Tinto Group. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00B20222023202420252026
3.93B
30.65B
(TX) Total Revenue
(RIO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TX vs. RIO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ternium S.A. and Rio Tinto Group over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
17.5%
26.6%
Portfolio components
TX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ternium S.A. reported a gross profit of 686.87M and revenue of 3.93B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.5%.

RIO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rio Tinto Group reported a gross profit of 8.15B and revenue of 30.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.6%.

TX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ternium S.A. reported an operating income of 290.07M and revenue of 3.93B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.4%.

RIO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rio Tinto Group reported an operating income of 8.15B and revenue of 30.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.6%.

TX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ternium S.A. reported a net income of 213.02M and revenue of 3.93B, resulting in a net margin of 5.4%.

RIO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rio Tinto Group reported a net income of 5.42B and revenue of 30.65B, resulting in a net margin of 17.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TX and RIO have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TX has higher volatility (15.68%) compared to RIO (11.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TX dropped -89.66% vs RIO's -88.97%.

RIO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.29 vs 2.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TX and RIO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer