PortfoliosLab logo
TWO vs. QYLD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between TWO and QYLD is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

TWO vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Two Harbors Investment Corp. (TWO) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

TWO:

-0.32

QYLD:

0.35

Sortino Ratio

TWO:

-0.11

QYLD:

0.61

Omega Ratio

TWO:

0.99

QYLD:

1.10

Calmar Ratio

TWO:

-0.08

QYLD:

0.33

Martin Ratio

TWO:

-0.55

QYLD:

1.12

Ulcer Index

TWO:

10.01%

QYLD:

5.64%

Daily Std Dev

TWO:

26.00%

QYLD:

19.19%

Max Drawdown

TWO:

-84.71%

QYLD:

-24.75%

Current Drawdown

TWO:

-68.56%

QYLD:

-9.28%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TWO achieves a -6.81% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's -5.19% return. Over the past 10 years, TWO has underperformed QYLD with an annualized return of -6.48%, while QYLD has yielded a comparatively higher 7.72% annualized return.


TWO

YTD

-6.81%

1M

-13.73%

6M

-7.12%

1Y

-8.18%

3Y*

-9.27%

5Y*

-0.90%

10Y*

-6.48%

QYLD

YTD

-5.19%

1M

1.44%

6M

-3.60%

1Y

6.66%

3Y*

9.52%

5Y*

7.86%

10Y*

7.72%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Two Harbors Investment Corp.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

TWO vs. QYLD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TWO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TWO is 3636
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TWO is 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TWO is 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TWO is 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TWO is 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TWO is 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

QYLD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QYLD is 3636
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QYLD is 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QYLD is 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QYLD is 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QYLD is 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QYLD is 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

TWO vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Two Harbors Investment Corp. (TWO) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current TWO Sharpe Ratio is -0.32, which is lower than the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TWO and QYLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

TWO vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

TWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.58%, more than QYLD's 13.72% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
TWO
Two Harbors Investment Corp.
17.58%15.22%15.08%12.94%11.79%7.85%11.42%14.64%10.65%10.67%12.84%10.38%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
13.72%12.50%11.78%13.75%12.85%11.16%9.84%12.44%7.69%9.15%9.42%10.74%

Drawdowns

TWO vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TWO drawdown since its inception was -84.71%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TWO and QYLD.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

TWO vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison

Two Harbors Investment Corp. (TWO) has a higher volatility of 9.56% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 1.93%. This indicates that TWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...