PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TWLO vs. QLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TWLO vs. QLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Twilio Inc. (TWLO) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TWLO achieves a 59.77% return, which is significantly higher than QLD's 42.06% return.


TWLO

1D
-0.89%
1M
19.82%
YTD
59.77%
6M
77.38%
1Y
93.45%
3Y*
50.14%
5Y*
-6.02%
10Y*

QLD

1D
-0.53%
1M
21.54%
YTD
42.06%
6M
37.45%
1Y
85.49%
3Y*
50.15%
5Y*
25.75%
10Y*
36.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TWLO vs. QLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TWLO
Twilio Inc.
59.77%31.61%42.45%54.96%-81.41%-22.20%244.42%10.06%278.39%-18.20%
QLD
ProShares Ultra QQQ
42.06%30.36%42.82%117.72%-60.52%54.67%88.90%81.69%-8.31%70.34%

Correlation

The correlation between TWLO and QLD is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2016

0.53

The correlation between TWLO and QLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.57 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TWLO vs. QLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TWLO
TWLO Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
TWLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TWLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
TWLO Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
TWLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
TWLO Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

QLD
QLD Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
QLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLD Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
QLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLD Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TWLO vs. QLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Twilio Inc. (TWLO) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TWLOQLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.41

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

3.42

-0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.07

11.92

-4.84

TWLO vs. QLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TWLO Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is lower than the QLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TWLO and QLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TWLOQLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.57

2.70

-1.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.10

0.58

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.60

-0.22

Drawdowns

TWLO vs. QLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TWLO drawdown since its inception was -90.36%, which is greater than QLD's maximum drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TWLO and QLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TWLOQLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.36%

-83.13%

-7.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.34%

-25.13%

-5.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.17%

-42.29%

-2.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-89.57%

-63.68%

-25.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.76%

-0.53%

-48.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-49.52%

-18.17%

-31.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.25%

7.20%

+6.05%

Volatility

TWLO vs. QLD - Volatility Comparison

Twilio Inc. (TWLO) has a higher volatility of 20.70% compared to ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) at 8.90%. This indicates that TWLO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TWLOQLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.70%

8.90%

+11.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.37%

24.08%

+18.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

59.85%

31.85%

+28.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.24%

44.74%

+14.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

60.75%

44.56%

+16.19%

Dividends

TWLO vs. QLD - Dividend Comparison

TWLO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QLD
ProShares Ultra QQQ
0.12%0.17%0.25%0.33%0.31%0.00%0.00%0.13%0.06%0.02%0.21%0.11%
TWLO
Twilio Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TWLO and QLD have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TWLO has higher volatility (20.70%) compared to QLD (8.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TWLO dropped -90.36% vs QLD's -83.13%.

QLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TWLO and QLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer