PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TW vs. CBOE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TW vs. CBOE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradeweb Markets Inc. (TW) and Cboe Global Markets, Inc. (CBOE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TW achieves a -8.45% return, which is significantly lower than CBOE's 2.45% return.


TW

1D
-1.30%
1M
-7.40%
YTD
-8.45%
6M
-7.34%
1Y
-29.20%
3Y*
12.72%
5Y*
3.34%
10Y*

CBOE

1D
2.76%
1M
-28.22%
YTD
2.45%
6M
2.11%
1Y
14.53%
3Y*
25.12%
5Y*
18.18%
10Y*
16.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TW vs. CBOE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TW
Tradeweb Markets Inc.
-8.45%-17.55%44.56%40.61%-34.86%60.96%35.50%36.03%
CBOE
Cboe Global Markets, Inc.
2.45%29.96%10.74%44.37%-2.16%42.23%-21.17%26.50%

Correlation

The correlation between TW and CBOE is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2019

0.30

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TW:

$20.95B

CBOE:

$26.88B

EPS

TW:

$4.05

CBOE:

$11.77

PE Ratio

TW:

24.22

CBOE:

21.76

PEG Ratio

TW:

0.66

CBOE:

0.41

PS Ratio

TW:

9.75

CBOE:

5.61

PB Ratio

TW:

3.16

CBOE:

5.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

TW:

$2.16B

CBOE:

$4.79B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TW:

$1.56B

CBOE:

$2.50B

EBITDA (TTM)

TW:

$1.34B

CBOE:

$1.87B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TW vs. CBOE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TW
TW Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
TW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TW Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
TW Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
TW Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
TW Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

CBOE
CBOE Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
CBOE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBOE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBOE Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
CBOE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBOE Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TW vs. CBOE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradeweb Markets Inc. (TW) and Cboe Global Markets, Inc. (CBOE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TWCBOEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.83

1.12

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.89

0.46

-1.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.32

2.12

-3.44

TW vs. CBOE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TW Sharpe Ratio is -1.03, which is lower than the CBOE Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TW and CBOE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TW vs. CBOE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TW drawdown since its inception was -48.64%, which is greater than CBOE's maximum drawdown of -43.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TW and CBOE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TWCBOEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.64%

-43.23%

-5.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.76%

-31.93%

-0.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.89%

-31.93%

-1.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.64%

-31.93%

-16.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.74%

-30.05%

-3.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.94%

-11.43%

-2.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.20%

6.85%

+15.35%

Volatility

TW vs. CBOE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tradeweb Markets Inc. (TW) is 8.34%, while Cboe Global Markets, Inc. (CBOE) has a volatility of 18.36%. This indicates that TW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CBOE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TWCBOEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.34%

18.36%

-10.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.24%

26.62%

-5.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.46%

29.55%

-1.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.58%

23.66%

+2.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.13%

25.59%

+4.54%

Dividends

TW vs. CBOE - Dividend Comparison

TW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than CBOE's 1.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CBOE
Cboe Global Markets, Inc.
1.13%1.08%1.21%1.18%1.56%1.38%1.68%1.12%1.19%0.83%1.30%1.36%
TW
Tradeweb Markets Inc.
0.53%0.45%0.31%0.40%0.49%0.32%0.51%0.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

TW vs. CBOE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tradeweb Markets Inc. and Cboe Global Markets, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20222023202420252026
617.76M
1.27B
(TW) Total Revenue
(CBOE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TW vs. CBOE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Tradeweb Markets Inc. and Cboe Global Markets, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%20222023202420252026
66.7%
52.6%
Portfolio components
TW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tradeweb Markets Inc. reported a gross profit of 411.78M and revenue of 617.76M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.7%.

CBOE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cboe Global Markets, Inc. reported a gross profit of 669.90M and revenue of 1.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.6%.

TW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tradeweb Markets Inc. reported an operating income of 287.25M and revenue of 617.76M, resulting in an operating margin of 46.5%.

CBOE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cboe Global Markets, Inc. reported an operating income of 505.60M and revenue of 1.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 39.7%.

TW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tradeweb Markets Inc. reported a net income of 205.28M and revenue of 617.76M, resulting in a net margin of 33.2%.

CBOE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cboe Global Markets, Inc. reported a net income of 385.70M and revenue of 1.27B, resulting in a net margin of 30.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TW and CBOE have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CBOE has higher volatility (18.36%) compared to TW (8.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TW dropped -48.64% vs CBOE's -43.23%.

CBOE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.49 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TW and CBOE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer