PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TUGN vs. BST
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TUGN vs. BST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF (TUGN) and BlackRock Science and Technology Trust (BST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TUGN vs. BST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
TUGN
STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF
-6.61%19.11%18.44%34.84%-18.78%
BST
BlackRock Science and Technology Trust
-8.64%23.65%17.96%30.07%-15.35%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TUGN achieves a -6.61% return, which is significantly higher than BST's -8.64% return.


TUGN

1D
3.10%
1M
-4.72%
YTD
-6.61%
6M
-6.35%
1Y
19.88%
3Y*
16.64%
5Y*
10Y*

BST

1D
3.50%
1M
-8.97%
YTD
-8.64%
6M
-6.04%
1Y
22.64%
3Y*
14.09%
5Y*
0.29%
10Y*
16.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TUGN vs. BST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TUGN
TUGN Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
TUGN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TUGN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
TUGN Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
TUGN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
TUGN Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

BST
BST Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
BST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BST Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
BST Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
BST Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
BST Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TUGN vs. BST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF (TUGN) and BlackRock Science and Technology Trust (BST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TUGNBSTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.93

1.03

-0.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.46

1.54

-0.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.22

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.54

1.36

+0.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.16

4.44

+0.72

TUGN vs. BST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TUGN Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is comparable to the BST Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TUGN and BST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TUGNBSTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

1.03

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.55

+0.04

Correlation

The correlation between TUGN and BST is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

TUGN vs. BST - Dividend Comparison

TUGN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.75%, more than BST's 11.56% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TUGN
STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF
12.75%11.50%11.84%10.83%7.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BST
BlackRock Science and Technology Trust
11.56%10.36%8.21%8.91%10.57%5.38%3.85%10.52%6.41%4.80%6.69%6.93%

Drawdowns

TUGN vs. BST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TUGN drawdown since its inception was -23.45%, smaller than the maximum BST drawdown of -47.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TUGN and BST.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TUGNBSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.45%

-47.72%

+24.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.96%

-15.31%

+2.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.26%

-12.35%

+2.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.65%

-13.14%

+6.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.87%

4.70%

-0.83%

Volatility

TUGN vs. BST - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF (TUGN) is 5.87%, while BlackRock Science and Technology Trust (BST) has a volatility of 7.49%. This indicates that TUGN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TUGNBSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.87%

7.49%

-1.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.73%

13.67%

-1.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.54%

22.03%

-0.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.01%

23.46%

-6.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.01%

25.59%

-8.58%