TTD vs. VUG
TTD (The Trade Desk, Inc.) is a stock, while VUG (Vanguard Growth ETF) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. Over the past 5 years, TTD returned -18.58%/yr vs 15.11%/yr for VUG. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
TTD vs. VUG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TTD achieves a -45.84% return, which is significantly lower than VUG's 9.49% return.
TTD
- 1D
- -2.56%
- 1M
- -14.69%
- YTD
- -45.84%
- 6M
- -46.75%
- 1Y
- -72.37%
- 3Y*
- -34.82%
- 5Y*
- -18.58%
- 10Y*
- —
VUG
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- 6.22%
- YTD
- 9.49%
- 6M
- 8.72%
- 1Y
- 27.84%
- 3Y*
- 25.93%
- 5Y*
- 15.11%
- 10Y*
- 18.26%
TTD vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTD The Trade Desk, Inc. | -45.84% | -67.70% | 63.33% | 60.52% | -51.08% | 14.41% | 208.34% | 123.83% | 153.79% | 65.27% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 9.49% | 19.40% | 32.69% | 46.83% | -33.16% | 27.35% | 40.25% | 37.03% | -3.32% | 27.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between TTD and VUG is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2016 | 0.58 |
Over the past year, the correlation between TTD and VUG has dropped to 0.31 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TTD vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank
TTD
VUG
TTD vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Trade Desk, Inc. (TTD) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TTD | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.71 | 1.31 | -0.59 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.93 | 1.69 | -2.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.31 | 5.92 | -7.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TTD | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.13 | 1.77 | -2.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.28 | 0.68 | -0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.62 | -0.30 |
Drawdowns
TTD vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TTD drawdown since its inception was -85.60%, which is greater than VUG's maximum drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTD and VUG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TTD | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.60% | -50.68% | -34.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -77.62% | -16.53% | -61.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -85.60% | -22.85% | -62.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -85.60% | -35.61% | -49.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -85.26% | -1.51% | -83.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.12% | -7.09% | -20.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 55.37% | 4.71% | +50.66% |
Volatility
TTD vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison
The Trade Desk, Inc. (TTD) has a higher volatility of 19.09% compared to Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) at 3.83%. This indicates that TTD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TTD | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.09% | 3.83% | +15.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.79% | 12.11% | +28.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 64.16% | 15.84% | +48.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.33% | 22.22% | +45.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.48% | 21.44% | +47.04% |
Dividends
TTD vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison
TTD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTD The Trade Desk, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 0.37% | 0.41% | 0.47% | 0.58% | 0.70% | 0.48% | 0.66% | 0.95% | 1.32% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TTD and VUG have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TTD has higher volatility (19.09%) compared to VUG (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TTD dropped -85.60% vs VUG's -50.68%.
VUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs -1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TTD and VUG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer