TTAI vs. SPYG
TTAI (TrimTabs International Free Cash Flow Quality ETF of Benef Interest) and SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TTAI is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by TrimTabs, while SPYG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index. TTAI is actively managed, while SPYG is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TTAI returned 2.59%/yr vs 14.78%/yr for SPYG. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TTAI charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYG.
Performance
TTAI vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TTAI achieves a 6.84% return, which is significantly lower than SPYG's 11.38% return.
TTAI
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- 4.46%
- YTD
- 6.84%
- 6M
- 6.37%
- 1Y
- 14.17%
- 3Y*
- 10.39%
- 5Y*
- 2.59%
- 10Y*
- —
SPYG
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 11.38%
- 6M
- 11.00%
- 1Y
- 31.61%
- 3Y*
- 26.51%
- 5Y*
- 14.78%
- 10Y*
- 18.34%
TTAI vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTAI TrimTabs International Free Cash Flow Quality ETF of Benef Interest | 6.84% | 13.27% | 0.39% | 18.22% | -24.37% | 16.87% | 18.30% | 24.52% | -17.73% | 7.78% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 11.38% | 22.09% | 35.99% | 30.02% | -29.41% | 32.01% | 33.46% | 30.84% | -0.12% | 12.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between TTAI and SPYG is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2017 | 0.65 |
The correlation between TTAI and SPYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
TTAI vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TTAI
SPYG
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Technology
TTAI
SPYG
Consumer Cyclical
TTAI
SPYG
Healthcare
TTAI
SPYG
Industrials
TTAI
SPYG
Consumer Defensive
TTAI
SPYG
Financial Services
TTAI
SPYG
Communication Services
TTAI
SPYG
Basic Materials
TTAI
SPYG
Energy
TTAI
SPYG
Utilities
TTAI
SPYG
Real Estate
TTAI
-
SPYG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TTAI vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank
TTAI
SPYG
TTAI vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrimTabs International Free Cash Flow Quality ETF of Benef Interest (TTAI) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TTAI | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.33 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.09 | 2.31 | -1.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.79 | 9.21 | -5.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TTAI vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TTAI drawdown since its inception was -34.17%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTAI and SPYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TTAI | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.17% | -67.63% | +33.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.00% | -13.76% | +0.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.34% | -22.14% | +0.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.13% | -32.67% | -1.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.19% | +3.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.17% | -24.28% | +15.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.75% | 3.44% | +0.31% |
Volatility
TTAI vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison
TrimTabs International Free Cash Flow Quality ETF of Benef Interest (TTAI) has a higher volatility of 7.84% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) at 6.83%. This indicates that TTAI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TTAI | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.84% | 6.83% | +1.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.80% | 13.72% | +2.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.35% | 17.11% | +1.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.21% | 21.34% | -4.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.00% | 20.74% | -1.74% |
TTAI vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
TTAI has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
TTAI vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison
TTAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, more than SPYG's 0.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.60% | 0.52% | 0.60% | 1.15% | 1.03% | 0.62% | 0.90% | 1.37% | 1.51% | 1.41% | 1.55% | 1.57% |
TTAI TrimTabs International Free Cash Flow Quality ETF of Benef Interest | 2.38% | 2.30% | 2.13% | 2.39% | 9.36% | 2.01% | 0.64% | 1.90% | 0.92% | 0.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TTAI and SPYG have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TTAI has higher volatility (7.84%) compared to SPYG (6.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TTAI dropped -34.17% vs SPYG's -67.63%.
On 5-year performance, SPYG leads with 14.78% vs 2.59% for TTAI. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYG has been the lower-risk option at 6.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 14.78% return vs 2.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for TTAI.
TTAI has the higher dividend yield at 2.38%, compared with 0.60% for SPYG.
TTAI is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while SPYG is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: TrimTabs and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for TTAI and 0.04% for SPYG.
SPYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TTAI and SPYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer