TTAC vs. JPST
TTAC (TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF) and JPST (JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TTAC is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by TrimTabs, while JPST is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by JPMorgan. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, TTAC returned 12.77%/yr vs 3.61%/yr for JPST. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TTAC charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for JPST.
Performance
TTAC vs. JPST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TTAC achieves a 17.63% return, which is significantly higher than JPST's 1.40% return.
TTAC
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 6.04%
- YTD
- 17.63%
- 6M
- 17.18%
- 1Y
- 20.72%
- 3Y*
- 19.01%
- 5Y*
- 12.77%
- 10Y*
- —
JPST
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 1.40%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- 1Y
- 4.31%
- 3Y*
- 5.16%
- 5Y*
- 3.61%
- 10Y*
- —
TTAC vs. JPST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTAC TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF | 17.63% | 8.07% | 18.26% | 22.97% | -14.60% | 30.66% | 18.30% | 26.03% | -6.26% | 15.23% |
JPST JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF | 1.40% | 4.99% | 5.58% | 5.13% | 1.14% | 0.11% | 2.18% | 3.34% | 2.23% | 0.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between TTAC and JPST is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2017 | 0.07 |
The correlation between TTAC and JPST shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (all time) to 0.17 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
TTAC vs. JPST - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TTAC
JPST
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
-
Technology
TTAC
JPST
Financial Services
TTAC
JPST
Consumer Cyclical
TTAC
JPST
Healthcare
TTAC
JPST
Industrials
TTAC
JPST
Consumer Defensive
TTAC
JPST
Communication Services
TTAC
JPST
Energy
TTAC
JPST
Basic Materials
TTAC
JPST
Real Estate
TTAC
JPST
Utilities
TTAC
-
JPST
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TTAC vs. JPST — Risk / Return Rank
TTAC
JPST
TTAC vs. JPST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF (TTAC) and JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF (JPST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TTAC | JPST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -6.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -15.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 3.94 | -2.70 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.90 | 29.16 | -26.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.41 | 144.13 | -134.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TTAC | JPST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.36 | 8.09 | -6.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 6.32 | -5.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 3.20 | -2.42 |
Drawdowns
TTAC vs. JPST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TTAC drawdown since its inception was -34.95%, which is greater than JPST's maximum drawdown of -3.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTAC and JPST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TTAC | JPST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.95% | -3.28% | -31.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.17% | -0.15% | -7.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.92% | -0.30% | -19.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.88% | -0.79% | -21.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.02% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.99% | -0.08% | -4.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.21% | 0.03% | +2.18% |
Volatility
TTAC vs. JPST - Volatility Comparison
TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF (TTAC) has a higher volatility of 4.48% compared to JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF (JPST) at 0.15%. This indicates that TTAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TTAC | JPST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.48% | 0.15% | +4.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.70% | 0.36% | +11.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.31% | 0.54% | +14.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.09% | 0.58% | +16.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.71% | 0.93% | +17.78% |
TTAC vs. JPST - Expense Ratio Comparison
TTAC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than JPST's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
TTAC vs. JPST - Dividend Comparison
TTAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than JPST's 4.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPST JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF | 4.26% | 4.43% | 5.16% | 4.79% | 1.83% | 0.73% | 1.43% | 2.69% | 2.07% | 0.96% |
TTAC TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF | 0.53% | 0.62% | 0.70% | 0.94% | 1.36% | 9.63% | 0.41% | 0.72% | 0.62% | 0.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TTAC and JPST have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TTAC has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to JPST (0.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TTAC dropped -34.95% vs JPST's -3.28%.
On 5-year performance, TTAC leads with 12.77% vs 3.61% for JPST. On fees, JPST is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, JPST has been the lower-risk option at 0.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, TTAC has performed better with a 12.77% return vs 3.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JPST is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for TTAC.
JPST has the higher dividend yield at 4.26%, compared with 0.53% for TTAC.
TTAC is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while JPST is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: TrimTabs and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for TTAC and 0.18% for JPST.
JPST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.09 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TTAC and JPST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer