TT vs. AME

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Trane Technologies plc (TT) and AMETEK, Inc. (AME).

Performance

TT vs. AME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Trane Technologies plc (TT) and AMETEK, Inc. (AME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TT vs. AME - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TT Trane Technologies plc	7.33%	6.38%	52.97%	47.39%	-15.34%	41.02%	11.26%	48.32%	4.41%	21.27%
AME AMETEK, Inc.	4.57%	14.66%	10.01%	18.81%	-4.33%	22.32%	22.19%	48.27%	-5.89%	49.98%

Fundamentals

Market Cap TT : $93.18B AME : $49.38B
EPS TT : $13.01 AME : $6.40
PE Ratio TT : 32.04 AME : 33.48
PEG Ratio TT : 1.46 AME : 3.12
PS Ratio TT : 4.39 AME : 6.70
PB Ratio TT : 10.83 AME : 4.22
Total Revenue (TTM) TT : $21.32B AME : $7.40B
Gross Profit (TTM) TT : $7.71B AME : $1.95B
EBITDA (TTM) TT : $4.21B AME : $2.10B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TT achieves a 7.33% return, which is significantly higher than AME's 4.57% return. Over the past 10 years, TT has outperformed AME with an annualized return of 22.93%, while AME has yielded a comparatively lower 16.42% annualized return.

TT

• 1D: 3.17%
• 1M: -9.64%
• YTD: 7.33%
• 6M: -0.77%
• 1Y: 24.83%
• 3Y*: 32.81%
• 5Y*: 21.85%
• 10Y*: 22.93%

AME

• 1D: 2.87%
• 1M: -10.25%
• YTD: 4.57%
• 6M: 14.38%
• 1Y: 25.34%
• 3Y*: 14.57%
• 5Y*: 11.47%
• 10Y*: 16.42%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

TT vs. AME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TT

TT Risk / Return Rank: 68
TT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
TT Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
TT Omega Ratio Rank: 65
TT Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
TT Martin Ratio Rank: 66

AME

AME Risk / Return Rank: 76
AME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
AME Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
AME Omega Ratio Rank: 70
AME Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
AME Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TT vs. AME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trane Technologies plc (TT) and AMETEK, Inc. (AME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TT	AME	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.85	1.09	-0.24
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.36	1.70	-0.35
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.21	-0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.34	1.96	-0.63
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.69	6.41	-3.72
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TT vs. AME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TT Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is comparable to the AME Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TT and AME, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TT	AME	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85	1.09	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81	0.54	+0.27
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.82	0.68	+0.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	0.48	-0.02

Correlation

The correlation between TT and AME is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

TT vs. AME - Dividend Comparison

TT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, more than AME's 0.59% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
TT Trane Technologies plc	0.93%	0.97%	0.91%	1.23%	1.59%	1.17%	1.46%	1.59%	2.15%	1.91%	1.81%	2.10%
AME AMETEK, Inc.	0.59%	0.60%	0.62%	0.61%	0.63%	0.54%	0.60%	0.56%	0.83%	0.50%	0.74%	0.67%

Drawdowns

TT vs. AME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TT drawdown since its inception was -77.91%, which is greater than AME's maximum drawdown of -53.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TT and AME.

Drawdown Indicators

	TT	AME	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.91%	-53.31%	-24.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.97%	-13.57%	-6.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.53%	-27.06%	-13.47%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-51.13%	-42.72%	-8.41%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.60%	-11.08%	-0.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.88%	-11.94%	-2.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.92%	4.15%	+5.77%

Volatility

TT vs. AME - Volatility Comparison

Trane Technologies plc (TT) has a higher volatility of 10.97% compared to AMETEK, Inc. (AME) at 7.85%. This indicates that TT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TT	AME	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.97%	7.85%	+3.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.33%	16.04%	+4.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.46%	23.36%	+6.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.00%	21.31%	+5.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.14%	24.38%	+3.76%

Financials

TT vs. AME - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Trane Technologies plc and AMETEK, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

TT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Trane Technologies plc reported a gross profit of 1.75B and revenue of 5.14B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.1%.

AME - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, AMETEK, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.00B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

TT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Trane Technologies plc reported an operating income of 819.00M and revenue of 5.14B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.9%.

AME - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, AMETEK, Inc. reported an operating income of 505.48M and revenue of 2.00B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.3%.

TT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Trane Technologies plc reported a net income of 591.30M and revenue of 5.14B, resulting in a net margin of 11.5%.

AME - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, AMETEK, Inc. reported a net income of 398.60M and revenue of 2.00B, resulting in a net margin of 20.0%.