TSWE.AS vs. IUSA.L
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Sustainable World Equal Weight UCITS ETF (TSWE.AS) and iShares S&P 500 UCITS Dist (IUSA.L).
TSWE.AS and IUSA.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TSWE.AS is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on May 3, 2013. IUSA.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 TR USD. It was launched on Mar 15, 2002. Both TSWE.AS and IUSA.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: TSWE.AS or IUSA.L.
Key characteristics
| TSWE.AS | IUSA.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 12.04% | 14.48% |
| 1Y Return | 16.79% | 19.97% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 6.25% | 11.45% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 10.29% | 14.05% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 9.40% | 15.34% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.72 | 1.78 |
| Daily Std Dev | 10.60% | 11.26% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.67% | -38.58% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.80% | -2.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSWE.AS and IUSA.L is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
TSWE.AS vs. IUSA.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, TSWE.AS achieves a 12.04% return, which is significantly lower than IUSA.L's 14.48% return. Over the past 10 years, TSWE.AS has underperformed IUSA.L with an annualized return of 9.40%, while IUSA.L has yielded a comparatively higher 15.34% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TSWE.AS vs. IUSA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSWE.AS has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IUSA.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
TSWE.AS vs. IUSA.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Sustainable World Equal Weight UCITS ETF (TSWE.AS) and iShares S&P 500 UCITS Dist (IUSA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
TSWE.AS vs. IUSA.L - Dividend Comparison
TSWE.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%, more than IUSA.L's 1.40% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSWE.AS VanEck Sustainable World Equal Weight UCITS ETF | 2.18% | 2.23% | 2.38% | 1.64% | 1.88% | 2.34% | 2.45% | 2.09% | 1.85% | 1.87% | 5.46% | 0.31% |
IUSA.L iShares S&P 500 UCITS Dist | 1.40% | 1.55% | 1.74% | 1.39% | 1.80% | 1.96% | 2.22% | 1.95% | 1.75% | 2.29% | 1.95% | 2.28% |
Drawdowns
TSWE.AS vs. IUSA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSWE.AS drawdown since its inception was -33.67%, smaller than the maximum IUSA.L drawdown of -38.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSWE.AS and IUSA.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
TSWE.AS vs. IUSA.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Sustainable World Equal Weight UCITS ETF (TSWE.AS) is 3.62%, while iShares S&P 500 UCITS Dist (IUSA.L) has a volatility of 3.83%. This indicates that TSWE.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUSA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.