TSLQ vs. VONG
TSLQ (Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF) and VONG (Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSLQ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Tradr, while VONG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth Index. TSLQ is actively managed, while VONG is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TSLQ returned -64.56%/yr vs 21.35%/yr for VONG. At a correlation of -0.58, they often move in opposite directions. TSLQ charges 1.17%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VONG.
Performance
TSLQ vs. VONG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLQ achieves a -1.10% return, which is significantly lower than VONG's 4.46% return.
TSLQ
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- -2.23%
- 6M
- -1.37%
- YTD
- -1.10%
- 1Y
- -62.15%
- 3Y*
- -64.56%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VONG
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- 1.45%
- 6M
- 3.86%
- YTD
- 4.46%
- 1Y
- 15.60%
- 3Y*
- 21.35%
- 5Y*
- 13.01%
- 10Y*
- 18.00%
TSLQ vs. VONG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSLQ Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF | -1.10% | -74.67% | -83.21% | -59.97% | 61.04% |
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 4.46% | 18.45% | 33.20% | 42.67% | -2.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLQ and VONG is -0.60, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2022 | -0.58 |
The correlation between TSLQ and VONG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.60 to -0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLQ vs. VONG — Risk / Return Rank
TSLQ
VONG
TSLQ vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSLQ) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSLQ | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.17 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.90 | 0.97 | -1.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.14 | 3.05 | -4.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSLQ vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLQ drawdown since its inception was -98.73%, which is greater than VONG's maximum drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLQ and VONG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLQ | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.73% | -32.72% | -66.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -69.32% | -16.23% | -53.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -97.85% | -23.27% | -74.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.53% | -4.15% | -94.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -68.04% | -4.88% | -63.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 54.54% | 5.13% | +49.41% |
Volatility
TSLQ vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison
Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSLQ) has a higher volatility of 34.45% compared to Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) at 6.52%. This indicates that TSLQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLQ | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 34.45% | 6.52% | +27.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 62.84% | 13.43% | +49.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 89.53% | 16.72% | +72.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 94.85% | 21.56% | +73.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 94.85% | 20.95% | +73.90% |
TSLQ vs. VONG - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSLQ has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than VONG's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSLQ vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison
TSLQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.68%, more than VONG's 0.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSLQ Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF | 10.68% | 10.56% | 4.95% | 13.35% | 2.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 0.46% | 0.45% | 0.55% | 0.71% | 0.98% | 0.58% | 0.77% | 1.03% | 1.18% | 1.19% | 1.48% | 1.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLQ and VONG have a correlation of -0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLQ has higher volatility (34.45%) compared to VONG (6.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLQ dropped -98.73% vs VONG's -32.72%.
On 3-year performance, VONG leads with 21.35% vs -64.56% for TSLQ. On fees, VONG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VONG has been the lower-risk option at 6.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, VONG has performed better with a 21.35% return vs -64.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VONG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for TSLQ.
TSLQ has the higher dividend yield at 10.68%, compared with 0.46% for VONG.
TSLQ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while VONG is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for TSLQ and 0.06% for VONG.
VONG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.94 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSLQ and VONG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer