TSLQ vs. VONG
TSLQ (Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF) and VONG (Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSLQ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Tradr, while VONG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth Index. TSLQ is actively managed, while VONG is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TSLQ returned -61.47%/yr vs 22.28%/yr for VONG. Their -0.59 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. TSLQ charges 1.17%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VONG.
Performance
TSLQ vs. VONG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLQ achieves a 39.32% return, which is significantly higher than VONG's 5.04% return.
TSLQ
- 1D
- 3.69%
- 1M
- 56.37%
- 6M
- 17.46%
- YTD
- 39.32%
- 1Y
- -47.66%
- 3Y*
- -61.47%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -55.25%
VONG
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 0.79%
- 6M
- 9.54%
- YTD
- 5.04%
- 1Y
- 14.04%
- 3Y*
- 22.28%
- 5Y*
- 12.64%
- 10Y*
- 17.86%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.77%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $162.68M | $136.02M | $157.68M | |
| $123.97M | $146.25M | $172.18M |
TSLQ vs. VONG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSLQ Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF | 39.32% | -74.67% | -83.21% | -59.97% | 61.04% |
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 5.04% | 18.45% | 33.20% | 42.67% | -2.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLQ and VONG is -0.64, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2022 | -0.59 |
The correlation between TSLQ and VONG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.64 to -0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLQ vs. VONG — Risk / Return Rank
TSLQ
VONG
TSLQ vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSLQ) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSLQ | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.15 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.73 | 0.87 | -1.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.93 | 2.59 | -3.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSLQ vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLQ drawdown since its inception was -98.73%, which is greater than VONG's maximum drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLQ and VONG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLQ | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.73% | -32.72% | -66.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -65.58% | -16.23% | -49.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -97.85% | -23.27% | -74.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.92% | -3.62% | -94.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -68.51% | -4.89% | -63.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 54.47% | 5.44% | +49.03% |
Volatility
TSLQ vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison
Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSLQ) has a higher volatility of 31.97% compared to Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) at 6.96%. This indicates that TSLQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLQ | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 31.97% | 6.96% | +25.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 67.43% | 14.28% | +53.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 92.65% | 17.57% | +75.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 95.59% | 21.70% | +73.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 95.59% | 21.04% | +74.55% |
TSLQ vs. VONG - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSLQ has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than VONG's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSLQ vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison
TSLQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.58%, more than VONG's 0.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSLQ Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF | 7.58% | 10.56% | 4.95% | 13.35% | 2.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 0.46% | 0.45% | 0.55% | 0.71% | 0.98% | 0.58% | 0.77% | 1.03% | 1.18% | 1.19% | 1.48% | 1.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLQ and VONG have a correlation of -0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLQ has higher volatility (31.97%) compared to VONG (6.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLQ dropped -98.73% vs VONG's -32.72%.
On 3-year performance, VONG leads with 22.28% vs -61.47% for TSLQ. On fees, VONG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VONG has been the lower-risk option at 6.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, VONG has performed better with a 22.28% return vs -61.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VONG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for TSLQ.
TSLQ has the higher dividend yield at 7.58%, compared with 0.46% for VONG.
TSLQ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while VONG is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for TSLQ and 0.06% for VONG.
VONG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.80 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSLQ and VONG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer