TSLQ vs. SSG
TSLQ (AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF) and SSG (Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors) are both exchange-traded funds - TSLQ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by AXS, while SSG is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors Index (-200%). TSLQ is actively managed, while SSG is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TSLQ returned -68.13%/yr vs -74.95%/yr for SSG. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TSLQ charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SSG.
Performance
TSLQ vs. SSG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLQ achieves a -3.80% return, which is significantly higher than SSG's -61.47% return.
TSLQ
- 1D
- -3.75%
- 1M
- -18.02%
- YTD
- -3.80%
- 6M
- -15.12%
- 1Y
- -62.78%
- 3Y*
- -68.13%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SSG
- 1D
- -5.10%
- 1M
- -34.47%
- YTD
- -61.47%
- 6M
- -61.93%
- 1Y
- -82.39%
- 3Y*
- -74.95%
- 5Y*
- -67.33%
- 10Y*
- -62.17%
TSLQ vs. SSG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSLQ AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF | -3.80% | -74.67% | -83.21% | -59.97% | 63.52% |
SSG Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors | -61.47% | -70.03% | -77.59% | -78.69% | -13.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLQ and SSG is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2022 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLQ vs. SSG — Risk / Return Rank
TSLQ
SSG
TSLQ vs. SSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF (TSLQ) and Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors (SSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSLQ | SSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.68 | -1.34 | +0.66 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.86 | -3.24 | +2.38 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 0.66 | +0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.82 | -1.01 | +0.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.04 | -1.58 | +0.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSLQ | SSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.68 | -1.34 | +0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.90 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.65 | -0.79 | +0.14 |
Drawdowns
TSLQ vs. SSG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLQ drawdown since its inception was -98.73%, roughly equal to the maximum SSG drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLQ and SSG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLQ | SSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.73% | -100.00% | +1.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -75.93% | -81.36% | +5.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -97.85% | -98.49% | +0.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -99.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -99.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.57% | -100.00% | +1.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -67.15% | -88.59% | +21.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 59.46% | 52.66% | +6.80% |
Volatility
TSLQ vs. SSG - Volatility Comparison
AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF (TSLQ) has a higher volatility of 24.08% compared to Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors (SSG) at 21.32%. This indicates that TSLQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLQ | SSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.08% | 21.32% | +2.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.84% | 47.37% | +7.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 92.72% | 61.85% | +30.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 94.16% | 77.34% | +16.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 94.16% | 68.98% | +25.18% |
TSLQ vs. SSG - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSLQ has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SSG's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSLQ vs. SSG - Dividend Comparison
TSLQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.98%, less than SSG's 13.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSG Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors | 13.55% | 9.19% | 7.67% | 6.73% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.34% | 1.81% | 0.62% |
TSLQ AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF | 10.98% | 10.56% | 4.95% | 13.35% | 2.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLQ and SSG have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLQ has higher volatility (24.08%) compared to SSG (21.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLQ dropped -98.73% vs SSG's -100.00%.
On 3-year performance, TSLQ leads with -68.13% vs -74.95% for SSG. On fees, SSG is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, SSG has been the lower-risk option at 21.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, TSLQ has performed better with a -68.13% return vs -74.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SSG is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for TSLQ.
SSG has the higher dividend yield at 13.55%, compared with 10.98% for TSLQ.
TSLQ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while SSG is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: AXS and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for TSLQ and 0.95% for SSG.
TSLQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.68 vs -1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSLQ and SSG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer