PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSCSX vs. IMCG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSCSX vs. IMCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund Class S (TSCSX) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSCSX achieves a 12.98% return, which is significantly lower than IMCG's 20.05% return. Over the past 10 years, TSCSX has underperformed IMCG with an annualized return of 12.62%, while IMCG has yielded a comparatively higher 14.46% annualized return.


TSCSX

1D
1.22%
1M
4.74%
YTD
12.98%
6M
11.77%
1Y
24.87%
3Y*
13.11%
5Y*
6.13%
10Y*
12.62%

IMCG

1D
-0.26%
1M
8.33%
YTD
20.05%
6M
18.28%
1Y
23.35%
3Y*
18.91%
5Y*
8.62%
10Y*
14.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSCSX vs. IMCG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TSCSX
Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund Class S
12.98%2.36%12.73%12.47%-10.94%24.22%22.87%27.92%-10.52%21.22%
IMCG
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
20.05%6.55%18.14%20.73%-25.79%15.39%45.64%35.70%-3.68%25.57%

Correlation

The correlation between TSCSX and IMCG is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2004

0.86

The correlation between TSCSX and IMCG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSCSX vs. IMCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSCSX
TSCSX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
TSCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
TSCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

IMCG
IMCG Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
IMCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMCG Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
IMCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMCG Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSCSX vs. IMCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund Class S (TSCSX) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TSCSXIMCGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.26

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

2.31

+0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.85

8.97

-1.13

TSCSX vs. IMCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSCSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the IMCG Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSCSX and IMCG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TSCSXIMCGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.57

1.51

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.43

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.71

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.54

-0.13

Drawdowns

TSCSX vs. IMCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSCSX drawdown since its inception was -56.66%, roughly equal to the maximum IMCG drawdown of -58.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSCSX and IMCG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSCSXIMCGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.66%

-58.96%

+2.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.53%

-10.17%

-1.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.84%

-21.92%

-4.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.04%

-35.08%

+8.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.63%

-35.08%

-6.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.26%

+0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.25%

-9.22%

-1.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.43%

2.61%

+0.82%

Volatility

TSCSX vs. IMCG - Volatility Comparison

Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund Class S (TSCSX) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) have volatilities of 4.44% and 4.65%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSCSXIMCGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.44%

4.65%

-0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.33%

12.53%

-0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.20%

15.53%

+1.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.66%

20.17%

+1.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.13%

20.51%

+1.62%

TSCSX vs. IMCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSCSX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than IMCG's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSCSX vs. IMCG - Dividend Comparison

TSCSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, more than IMCG's 0.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMCG
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
0.65%0.78%0.78%0.85%0.91%0.41%0.09%0.30%0.35%0.45%0.52%0.38%
TSCSX
Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund Class S
2.09%2.36%3.18%0.46%9.60%11.33%1.60%8.72%15.00%6.68%4.19%8.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSCSX and IMCG have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IMCG has higher volatility (4.65%) compared to TSCSX (4.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSCSX dropped -56.66% vs IMCG's -58.96%.

TSCSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSCSX and IMCG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer