TSCSX vs. IMCG
Compare and contrast key facts about Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund Class S (TSCSX) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG).
TSCSX is managed by Thrivent. It was launched on Jul 1, 1996. IMCG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Growth Index. It was launched on Jun 28, 2004.
Performance
TSCSX vs. IMCG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TSCSX vs. IMCG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSCSX Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund Class S | -3.28% | 2.36% | 12.73% | 12.47% | -10.94% | 24.22% | 22.87% | 27.92% | -10.52% | 21.22% |
IMCG iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF | -1.19% | 6.55% | 18.14% | 20.73% | -25.79% | 15.39% | 45.64% | 35.70% | -3.68% | 25.57% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSCSX achieves a -3.28% return, which is significantly lower than IMCG's -1.19% return. Over the past 10 years, TSCSX has underperformed IMCG with an annualized return of 11.51%, while IMCG has yielded a comparatively higher 12.58% annualized return.
TSCSX
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- -9.54%
- YTD
- -3.28%
- 6M
- -1.94%
- 1Y
- 10.06%
- 3Y*
- 6.13%
- 5Y*
- 4.01%
- 10Y*
- 11.51%
IMCG
- 1D
- 3.63%
- 1M
- -6.39%
- YTD
- -1.19%
- 6M
- -4.39%
- 1Y
- 11.14%
- 3Y*
- 11.94%
- 5Y*
- 5.08%
- 10Y*
- 12.58%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TSCSX vs. IMCG - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSCSX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than IMCG's 0.06% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TSCSX vs. IMCG — Risk / Return Rank
TSCSX
IMCG
TSCSX vs. IMCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund Class S (TSCSX) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSCSX | IMCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.46 | 0.55 | -0.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.81 | 0.92 | -0.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.12 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.56 | 0.87 | -0.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.01 | 3.61 | -1.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSCSX | IMCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 | 0.55 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 | 0.25 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.62 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.50 | -0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between TSCSX and IMCG is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TSCSX vs. IMCG - Dividend Comparison
TSCSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, more than IMCG's 0.80% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSCSX Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund Class S | 2.44% | 2.36% | 3.18% | 0.46% | 9.60% | 11.33% | 1.60% | 8.72% | 15.00% | 6.68% | 4.19% | 8.34% |
IMCG iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.80% | 0.78% | 0.78% | 0.85% | 0.91% | 0.41% | 0.09% | 0.30% | 0.35% | 0.45% | 0.52% | 0.38% |
Drawdowns
TSCSX vs. IMCG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSCSX drawdown since its inception was -56.66%, roughly equal to the maximum IMCG drawdown of -58.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSCSX and IMCG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSCSX | IMCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.66% | -58.96% | +2.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.31% | -12.99% | -1.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.04% | -35.08% | +8.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.63% | -35.08% | -6.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.36% | -6.90% | -4.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.29% | -9.29% | -1.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.96% | 3.14% | +0.82% |
Volatility
TSCSX vs. IMCG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund Class S (TSCSX) is 6.31%, while iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) has a volatility of 7.19%. This indicates that TSCSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TSCSX | IMCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.31% | 7.19% | -0.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.48% | 12.08% | +0.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.16% | 20.27% | +1.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.65% | 20.09% | +1.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.08% | 20.44% | +1.64% |