PortfoliosLab logo
TSCO vs. MMC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between TSCO and MMC is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

TSCO vs. MMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tractor Supply Company (TSCO) and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

TSCO:

-0.39

MMC:

0.94

Sortino Ratio

TSCO:

-0.37

MMC:

1.04

Omega Ratio

TSCO:

0.95

MMC:

1.15

Calmar Ratio

TSCO:

-0.58

MMC:

0.99

Martin Ratio

TSCO:

-1.20

MMC:

2.77

Ulcer Index

TSCO:

9.74%

MMC:

4.68%

Daily Std Dev

TSCO:

29.61%

MMC:

17.57%

Max Drawdown

TSCO:

-76.17%

MMC:

-67.46%

Current Drawdown

TSCO:

-18.37%

MMC:

-5.23%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TSCO:

$26.71B

MMC:

$114.08B

EPS

TSCO:

$2.01

MMC:

$8.08

PE Ratio

TSCO:

24.41

MMC:

28.41

PEG Ratio

TSCO:

2.31

MMC:

2.46

PS Ratio

TSCO:

1.79

MMC:

4.55

PB Ratio

TSCO:

11.62

MMC:

8.04

Total Revenue (TTM)

TSCO:

$14.96B

MMC:

$25.05B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TSCO:

$5.21B

MMC:

$10.67B

EBITDA (TTM)

TSCO:

$1.92B

MMC:

$7.08B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSCO achieves a -6.91% return, which is significantly lower than MMC's 9.76% return. Over the past 10 years, TSCO has underperformed MMC with an annualized return of 12.46%, while MMC has yielded a comparatively higher 16.80% annualized return.


TSCO

YTD

-6.91%

1M

-1.35%

6M

-12.41%

1Y

-11.41%

3Y*

10.30%

5Y*

16.78%

10Y*

12.46%

MMC

YTD

9.76%

1M

4.27%

6M

-0.05%

1Y

16.30%

3Y*

14.47%

5Y*

18.65%

10Y*

16.80%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Tractor Supply Company

Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

TSCO vs. MMC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSCO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TSCO is 2222
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TSCO is 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TSCO is 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TSCO is 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TSCO is 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TSCO is 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

MMC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MMC is 7575
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MMC is 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MMC is 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MMC is 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MMC is 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MMC is 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

TSCO vs. MMC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tractor Supply Company (TSCO) and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current TSCO Sharpe Ratio is -0.39, which is lower than the MMC Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSCO and MMC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

TSCO vs. MMC - Dividend Comparison

TSCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, more than MMC's 1.41% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
TSCO
Tractor Supply Company
1.84%1.66%1.92%1.64%0.87%1.07%1.46%1.44%1.40%1.21%0.89%0.77%
MMC
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.
1.41%1.44%1.37%1.36%1.15%1.57%1.56%1.98%1.76%1.92%2.13%1.85%

Drawdowns

TSCO vs. MMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSCO drawdown since its inception was -76.17%, which is greater than MMC's maximum drawdown of -67.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSCO and MMC.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

TSCO vs. MMC - Volatility Comparison

Tractor Supply Company (TSCO) has a higher volatility of 6.80% compared to Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC) at 4.42%. This indicates that TSCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

TSCO vs. MMC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tractor Supply Company and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B20212022202320242025
3.47B
7.06B
(TSCO) Total Revenue
(MMC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TSCO vs. MMC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Tractor Supply Company and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

35.0%40.0%45.0%20212022202320242025
36.2%
45.5%
(TSCO) Gross Margin
(MMC) Gross Margin
TSCO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Tractor Supply Company reported a gross profit of 1.26B and revenue of 3.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.2%.

MMC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.21B and revenue of 7.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.5%.

TSCO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Tractor Supply Company reported an operating income of 249.14M and revenue of 3.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.2%.

MMC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.01B and revenue of 7.06B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.4%.

TSCO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Tractor Supply Company reported a net income of 179.37M and revenue of 3.47B, resulting in a net margin of 5.2%.

MMC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. reported a net income of 1.38B and revenue of 7.06B, resulting in a net margin of 19.6%.