TRTY vs. VT
TRTY (Cambria Trinity ETF) and VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TRTY is a Tactical Allocation fund tracking the Cambria Trinity Index, while VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TRTY returned 5.91%/yr vs 10.99%/yr for VT. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TRTY charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VT.
Performance
TRTY vs. VT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRTY achieves a 10.10% return, which is significantly lower than VT's 12.24% return.
TRTY
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- YTD
- 10.10%
- 6M
- 11.29%
- 1Y
- 23.79%
- 3Y*
- 11.86%
- 5Y*
- 5.91%
- 10Y*
- —
VT
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- 4.91%
- YTD
- 12.24%
- 6M
- 13.14%
- 1Y
- 29.24%
- 3Y*
- 20.93%
- 5Y*
- 10.99%
- 10Y*
- 12.74%
TRTY vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRTY Cambria Trinity ETF | 10.10% | 16.35% | 3.89% | 3.97% | -3.30% | 15.73% | 1.68% | 8.36% | -5.74% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 12.24% | 22.43% | 16.49% | 22.02% | -18.00% | 18.27% | 16.59% | 26.81% | -11.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRTY and VT is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2018 | 0.67 |
The correlation between TRTY and VT shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (all time) to 0.79 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
TRTY vs. VT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TRTY
VT
Energy
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Utilities
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Energy
TRTY
VT
Financial Services
TRTY
VT
Industrials
TRTY
VT
Basic Materials
TRTY
VT
Real Estate
TRTY
VT
Consumer Cyclical
TRTY
VT
Technology
TRTY
VT
Utilities
TRTY
VT
Communication Services
TRTY
VT
Consumer Defensive
TRTY
VT
Healthcare
TRTY
VT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRTY vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank
TRTY
VT
TRTY vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Trinity ETF (TRTY) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TRTY | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.50 | 2.31 | +0.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.17 | 3.20 | -0.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.42 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.35 | 3.04 | +1.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.99 | 13.53 | +4.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TRTY | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.50 | 2.31 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 0.69 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.44 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
TRTY vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRTY drawdown since its inception was -22.35%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRTY and VT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRTY | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.35% | -50.27% | +27.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.49% | -9.67% | +4.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.25% | -16.51% | +7.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.72% | -26.38% | +12.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.62% | -0.88% | +0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.17% | -7.02% | +2.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.33% | 2.17% | -0.84% |
Volatility
TRTY vs. VT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cambria Trinity ETF (TRTY) is 2.35%, while Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a volatility of 3.83%. This indicates that TRTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRTY | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.35% | 3.83% | -1.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.25% | 10.17% | -1.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.54% | 12.70% | -3.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.62% | 16.05% | -5.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.41% | 17.23% | -6.82% |
TRTY vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRTY has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
TRTY vs. VT - Dividend Comparison
TRTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, more than VT's 1.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRTY Cambria Trinity ETF | 3.01% | 2.86% | 3.55% | 3.24% | 5.17% | 4.52% | 1.99% | 2.64% | 1.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.59% | 1.82% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TRTY and VT have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VT has higher volatility (3.83%) compared to TRTY (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRTY dropped -22.35% vs VT's -50.27%.
On 5-year performance, VT leads with 10.99% vs 5.91% for TRTY. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, TRTY has been the lower-risk option at 2.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VT has performed better with a 10.99% return vs 5.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for TRTY.
TRTY has the higher dividend yield at 3.01%, compared with 1.59% for VT.
TRTY is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while VT is Global Equities. TRTY tracks Cambria Trinity Index, while VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Cambria and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for TRTY and 0.06% for VT.
TRTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TRTY and VT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer