PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRRKX vs. SWMRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRRKX vs. SWMRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Retirement 2045 Fund (TRRKX) and Schwab Target 2045 Fund (SWMRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRRKX achieves a 10.90% return, which is significantly higher than SWMRX's 9.87% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TRRKX having a 11.12% annualized return and SWMRX not far behind at 10.79%.


TRRKX

1D
1.15%
1M
1.33%
YTD
10.90%
6M
10.68%
1Y
20.73%
3Y*
15.76%
5Y*
8.05%
10Y*
11.12%

SWMRX

1D
1.03%
1M
1.28%
YTD
9.87%
6M
9.67%
1Y
24.00%
3Y*
16.50%
5Y*
8.88%
10Y*
10.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRRKX vs. SWMRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TRRKX
T. Rowe Price Retirement 2045 Fund
10.90%14.20%13.94%20.52%-19.03%15.80%18.64%25.41%-7.66%22.42%
SWMRX
Schwab Target 2045 Fund
9.87%18.84%13.37%20.10%-19.24%16.85%14.95%23.95%-9.82%21.39%

Correlation

The correlation between TRRKX and SWMRX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2013

0.96

The correlation between TRRKX and SWMRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRRKX vs. SWMRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRRKX
TRRKX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
TRRKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRRKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRRKX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
TRRKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRRKX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

SWMRX
SWMRX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
SWMRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWMRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWMRX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SWMRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWMRX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRRKX vs. SWMRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Retirement 2045 Fund (TRRKX) and Schwab Target 2045 Fund (SWMRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TRRKXSWMRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.38

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.21

2.75

-0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.06

11.90

-2.83

TRRKX vs. SWMRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRRKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the SWMRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRRKX and SWMRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TRRKX vs. SWMRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRRKX drawdown since its inception was -53.54%, which is greater than SWMRX's maximum drawdown of -30.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRRKX and SWMRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRRKXSWMRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.54%

-30.41%

-23.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.49%

-8.62%

-0.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.16%

-14.20%

-0.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.75%

-30.12%

+1.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.48%

-30.41%

-2.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-0.39%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.20%

-5.16%

-2.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.29%

1.99%

+0.30%

Volatility

TRRKX vs. SWMRX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Retirement 2045 Fund (TRRKX) has a higher volatility of 4.76% compared to Schwab Target 2045 Fund (SWMRX) at 4.52%. This indicates that TRRKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWMRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRRKXSWMRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.76%

4.52%

+0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.66%

9.39%

+1.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.72%

11.46%

+1.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.03%

15.50%

-0.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.37%

15.54%

-0.17%

TRRKX vs. SWMRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRRKX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than SWMRX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRRKX vs. SWMRX - Dividend Comparison

TRRKX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SWMRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SWMRX
Schwab Target 2045 Fund
4.71%5.18%3.14%2.98%7.88%5.18%2.45%5.46%6.63%2.79%5.28%5.76%
TRRKX
T. Rowe Price Retirement 2045 Fund
0.00%0.00%1.96%4.40%7.83%5.58%4.52%5.94%8.98%3.52%3.20%4.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, TRRKX and SWMRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TRRKX has higher volatility (4.76%) compared to SWMRX (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRRKX dropped -53.54% vs SWMRX's -30.41%.

SWMRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRRKX and SWMRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer