TRRJX vs. MOAT
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund (TRRJX) and VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT).
TRRJX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Feb 27, 2004. MOAT is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. It was launched on Apr 24, 2012.
Performance
TRRJX vs. MOAT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TRRJX vs. MOAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRRJX T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund | -0.81% | 10.96% | 11.99% | 18.14% | -17.96% | 15.21% | 17.04% | 23.72% | -6.95% | 20.89% |
MOAT VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | -6.87% | 13.20% | 10.73% | 31.89% | -13.66% | 24.12% | 14.84% | 34.79% | -1.28% | 23.18% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRRJX achieves a -0.81% return, which is significantly higher than MOAT's -6.87% return. Over the past 10 years, TRRJX has underperformed MOAT with an annualized return of 8.99%, while MOAT has yielded a comparatively higher 13.46% annualized return.
TRRJX
- 1D
- 2.20%
- 1M
- -5.39%
- YTD
- -0.81%
- 6M
- -3.17%
- 1Y
- 9.13%
- 3Y*
- 11.25%
- 5Y*
- 5.33%
- 10Y*
- 8.99%
MOAT
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -9.39%
- YTD
- -6.87%
- 6M
- -2.70%
- 1Y
- 11.53%
- 3Y*
- 10.62%
- 5Y*
- 7.92%
- 10Y*
- 13.46%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TRRJX vs. MOAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRRJX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than MOAT's 0.48% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TRRJX vs. MOAT — Risk / Return Rank
TRRJX
MOAT
TRRJX vs. MOAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund (TRRJX) and VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TRRJX | MOAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.72 | 0.59 | +0.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.07 | 0.98 | +0.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.13 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.77 | 0.83 | -0.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.24 | 3.12 | +0.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TRRJX | MOAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 | 0.59 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.44 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | 0.72 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.75 | -0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between TRRJX and MOAT is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TRRJX vs. MOAT - Dividend Comparison
TRRJX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MOAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRRJX T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.36% | 4.68% | 9.67% | 6.89% | 4.80% | 5.68% | 8.55% | 3.80% | 2.89% | 4.05% |
MOAT VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | 1.46% | 1.36% | 1.37% | 0.86% | 1.25% | 1.08% | 1.46% | 1.31% | 1.79% | 1.07% | 1.17% | 2.13% |
Drawdowns
TRRJX vs. MOAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRRJX drawdown since its inception was -53.57%, which is greater than MOAT's maximum drawdown of -33.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRRJX and MOAT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRRJX | MOAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.57% | -33.31% | -20.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.61% | -13.30% | +3.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.85% | -23.96% | -1.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.14% | -33.31% | +3.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.04% | -10.42% | +4.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.69% | -3.80% | -2.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.53% | 3.55% | -1.02% |
Volatility
TRRJX vs. MOAT - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund (TRRJX) and VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) have volatilities of 4.87% and 4.78%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TRRJX | MOAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.87% | 4.78% | +0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.45% | 10.10% | -1.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.57% | 19.76% | -6.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.81% | 18.09% | -5.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.52% | 18.71% | -5.19% |