PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TROSX vs. SFNNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TROSX vs. SFNNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Overseas Stock Fund (TROSX) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity Index Fund (SFNNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TROSX achieves a 11.98% return, which is significantly lower than SFNNX's 20.52% return. Over the past 10 years, TROSX has underperformed SFNNX with an annualized return of 9.55%, while SFNNX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.77% annualized return.


TROSX

1D
2.66%
1M
1.34%
6M
6.46%
YTD
11.98%
1Y
27.09%
3Y*
15.71%
5Y*
8.96%
10Y*
9.55%
ALL TIME*
5.34%

SFNNX

1D
2.95%
1M
3.46%
6M
12.42%
YTD
20.52%
1Y
41.01%
3Y*
21.52%
5Y*
14.23%
10Y*
11.77%
ALL TIME*
5.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

TROSX vs. SFNNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TROSX
T. Rowe Price Overseas Stock Fund
11.98%31.78%2.91%16.34%-15.42%12.24%9.24%22.91%-15.08%27.05%
SFNNX
Schwab Fundamental International Equity Index Fund
20.52%41.06%2.27%19.88%-7.95%14.38%4.35%18.09%-13.96%23.95%

Correlation

The correlation between TROSX and SFNNX is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2008

0.96

The correlation between TROSX and SFNNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TROSX vs. SFNNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TROSX
TROSX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
TROSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TROSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
TROSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
TROSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
TROSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

SFNNX
SFNNX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
SFNNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFNNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFNNX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
SFNNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFNNX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TROSX vs. SFNNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Overseas Stock Fund (TROSX) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity Index Fund (SFNNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TROSXSFNNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.46

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.08

3.74

-1.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.70

12.87

-5.17

TROSX vs. SFNNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TROSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is lower than the SFNNX Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TROSX and SFNNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TROSX vs. SFNNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TROSX drawdown since its inception was -60.62%, roughly equal to the maximum SFNNX drawdown of -59.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TROSX and SFNNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TROSXSFNNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.62%

-59.60%

-1.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.42%

-10.63%

-1.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.02%

-13.78%

-0.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.45%

-25.66%

-3.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.34%

-40.23%

+3.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.83%

+0.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.37%

-11.89%

-0.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.35%

3.08%

+0.27%

Volatility

TROSX vs. SFNNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Overseas Stock Fund (TROSX) is 4.64%, while Schwab Fundamental International Equity Index Fund (SFNNX) has a volatility of 5.08%. This indicates that TROSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SFNNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TROSXSFNNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.64%

5.08%

-0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.93%

13.58%

+0.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.31%

15.68%

+0.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.27%

15.76%

+0.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.70%

17.07%

-0.37%

TROSX vs. SFNNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TROSX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than SFNNX's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

TROSX vs. SFNNX - Dividend Comparison

TROSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, less than SFNNX's 4.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SFNNX
Schwab Fundamental International Equity Index Fund
4.24%5.11%3.61%3.26%2.92%3.81%2.42%3.69%3.51%2.70%3.21%2.92%
TROSX
T. Rowe Price Overseas Stock Fund
1.83%2.05%2.38%2.28%2.38%1.88%1.41%2.14%3.33%1.86%1.98%2.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, TROSX and SFNNX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SFNNX has higher volatility (5.08%) compared to TROSX (4.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TROSX dropped -60.62% vs SFNNX's -59.60%.

SFNNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TROSX and SFNNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer